The Role of Mediation in Resolving Civil Law Disputes in Indonesia
Main Article Content
Abstract
The utilisation of mediation as a mechanism for the resolution of civil law disputes in Indonesia has become increasingly significant, representing an alternative to the frequently protracted, expensive, and adversarial litigation process. Mediation, a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR), adopts a collaborative and amicable approach by facilitating dialogue between disputing parties with the assistance of a neutral third party. This study aims to examine the role and effectiveness of mediation within Indonesia's civil law framework, with a focus on its legal foundation and practical implementation. A qualitative research methodology was employed to analyse the recent scholarly literature, legal documentation and case studies, in order to draw conclusions on the impact of this process on a range of civil disputes, including those arising from family law, commercial conflicts and disputes relating to land ownership.The findings indicate that mediation has a number of significant advantages, including the expediting of dispute resolution, the reduction in legal expenses and the preservation of relationships between disputants, thereby alleviating the burden on Indonesia's overburdened judicial system. However, despite the evident benefits, the adoption of mediation in Indonesia faces considerable challenges. These challenges encompass a paucity of public awareness, inadequate mediator training and cultural perceptions that favour litigation over other solutions.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Al, B., Yuhelson, Y., & Akkapin, S. (2024). EFFECTIVENESS OF BUSINESS DISPUTE RESOLUTION THROUGH MEDIATION IN INDONESIA. PENA LAW: International Journal of Law, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.56107/penalaw.v2i2.185
Astreyko, V. V. (2024). Mediation as an alternative way of resolving disputes in public-law relations. Alʹmanah Prava, 15, 481–486. https://doi.org/10.33663/2524-017X-2024-15-481-486
Danialsyah. (2023). Juridical Analysis of Court Decisions Regarding Civil Lawsuits from a Civil Law Perspective. Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH), 2(2), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.55299/jsh.v2i2.705
Elina, E., Kusbianto, K., & Ruslan, R. (2024). Analysis of the Decision of the Industrial Relations Court in the Dispute for Termination of Employment (Case Study No. 060 / Pdt.Sus-Phi/2023/Pn Mdn Juncto Verdict Number :1174k / Pdt.Sus-Phi/2023 ). International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering (IAML), 3(3), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v3i3.102
Hasbi, H., & Larissa, D. (2024). Regulation of the Role of Mediators in Efforts to Resolve Employment Disputes: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and United Kingdom. Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 4(2), 923–931. https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v4i2.764
Khan, S. N. (2014). Qualitative Research Method - Phenomenology. Asian Social Science, 10(21). https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n21p298
Kostina, D. (2024). Mediation in Public-Law Disputes: an Innovative Approach to the Protection of Human Rights. Problems of Legality, 166, 140–157. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.166.312519
Majid, S., Al Hasan, F. A., Candra, M., & Saleh, A. I. (2024). Effectiveness of Dispute Resolution in Religious Courts Through Mediation by Non-Judge Mediators Within Banten. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 13(2), 251. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.13.2.2024.251-274
Muhamad, A., Sinaulan, R. L., & Khalimi, K. (2023). MEDIASI SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PAJAK. SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 2(11), 4667–4676. https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v2i11.1778
Naisabur, N. (2024). Comparative Mediation and Arbitration in Civil Dispute Resolution in Indonesia. JURNAL AKTA, 11(4), 1353. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v11i4.41664
Putri Dwi Ramadhani, S., & Arum Prastyanti, R. (2024). Analysis Of Land Ownership Disputes By Foreign Nationals Based On Wills: Case Study Of Supreme Court Decision No. 1134/Pdt/2009 In The Perspective Of International Civil Law. Mutiara: Multidiciplinary Scientifict Journal, 2(11). https://doi.org/10.57185/mutiara.v2i11.268
Rezah, F. S., & Sapada, A. T. (2024). Implications of Constitutional Court Decision Number 85/PUU-XX/2022 for the Dispute Resolution of Regional Head Election Results. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 6(2), 233–246. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v6i2.383
Sanjaya, A. S., Guntara, D.-, & Abas, M.-. (2024). Juridical Review Of Mediation Legal Products Outside Court In Connection With Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 Of 2016 Regarding Mediation Procedure In Court. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i3.3355
Sari, A. M., & Adlhiyati, Z. (2023). STUDI TENTANG PROSES MEDIASI DENGAN MEDIATOR HAKIM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TANAH DI PENGADILAN NEGERI SUKOHARJO. Verstek, 11(1), 169. https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v11i1.71649
Sukaenah, S., Rusli, R., & B, M. T. (2020). The Effectiveness of Indonesia Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 Year 2016 Concerning Mediation of Marriage Disputes. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY ISLAMIC LAW AND SOCIETY, 2(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.24239/ijcils.Vol2.Iss1.15