Reconstruction of Criminal Law Policy in Handling Cyber Crime: Perspectives of Technology Law and Human Rights

https://doi.org/10.55299/jsh.v3i3.1328

Authors

  • Hasnia Hasnia Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Indonesia
  • Asnal Hafiz Akademi Maritim Pembangunan Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Rasna Rasna Universitas Yapis Papua, Indonesia
  • Dwi Nurahman Universitas Mitra Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Jadiaman Parhusip Universitas Palangka Raya, Indonesia

Keywords:

legal, civil law, digital

Abstract

The rapid evolution of digital technologies has necessitated a critical reevaluation of criminal law frameworks globally, particularly in addressing cybercrime. This study identifies significant gaps in Indonesia’s current Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE) Law, including ambiguous definitions of cyber offenses such as electronic defamation (Article 27(3)) and hate speech (Article 28(2)), which have led to inconsistent judicial interpretations in 58% of analyzed cases. The absence of clear distinctions between personal data theft and state-sponsored cyberattacks further complicates prosecution, while 67% of regional law enforcement agencies lack specialized digital forensics units, prolonging investigations by an average of 287 days for cross-border evidence retrieval. Qualitative analysis of 12 landmark cases (2020–2024) and interviews with 15 legal and human rights experts reveal systemic human rights risks, including warrantless data collection in 43% of operations and a documented chilling effect on free expression due to overly broad libel provisions. Emerging technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) present dual challenges: while predictive policing tools reduce investigation timelines by 72%, algorithmic bias in 29% of AI systems exacerbates discrimination against marginalized groups. This research proposes a multidimensional reform strategy emphasizing: (1) legislative modernization through GDPR-inspired data categorization and tiered penalties; (2) establishment of a National Cyber Forensics Network to standardize technical capacity across Indonesia’s 34 provinces by 2027; and (3) adoption of rights-centric AI governance protocols requiring judicial oversight for surveillance tools. The analysis underscores the urgency of ratifying the Budapest Convention to streamline transnational cooperation, despite sovereignty concerns raised by 63% of prosecutors. Without these reforms, Indonesia risks both technological obsolescence in combating sophisticated cyber networks and systemic erosion of digital rights in its pursuit of cybercrime deterrence.

Downloads

References

Abdaud, F., & Haris, O. K. (2024). CYBER DEFAMATION IN INDONESIA’S NATIONAL CRIMINAL CODE: AN ANALYSIS OF THE NEW PROVISIONS. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 26(3), 739–763. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v26i3.34004

Albuainain, M. A., & Al Mubarak, M. (2024). Technological Advancements and Marketing Practices (pp. 503–515). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-62106-2_38

Anggraeny, I., Monique, C., Puspitasari Wardoyo, Y., & Bhirini Slamet, A. (2022). The Urgency of Establishing Guidelines for Handling Cybercrime Cases in the Indonesian National Police Department. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i15.12107

Arianto, A. R., & Anggraini, G. (2019). BUILDING INDONESIA’S NATIONAL CYBER DEFENSE AND SECURITY TO FACE THE GLOBAL CYBER THREATS THROUGH INDONESIA SECURITY INCIDENT RESPONSE TEAM ON INTERNET INFRASTRUCTURE (ID-SIRTII). Jurnal Pertahanan & Bela Negara, 9(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.33172/jpbh.v9i1.515

Bello, M., & Griffiths, M. (2021). Routine Activity Theory and Cybercrime Investigation in Nigeria: How Capable Are Law Enforcement Agencies? In Rethinking Cybercrime (pp. 213–235). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55841-3_11

Herlin Hastuti. (2023). Implementasi Penerapan Pidana Bersyarat dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP). Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH), 1(2), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.55299/jsh.v1i2.273

ICJ. (2021). Digital Technologies and Human Rights: a Legal Framework.

Judijanto, L., & Khuan, H. (2024). Juridical Analysis of Law Number 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE) and its Impact on Creative Economy Development in Indonesia. West Science Law and Human Rights, 2(04), 404–411. https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v2i04.1366

Jung, I. (2024). Week 7: Writing the Qualitative Methods Section. In Pathways to International Publication in the Social Sciences (pp. 135–145). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-0801-0_13

Khuan, H., & Wahyudi, F. S. (2025). Juridical Study of Digital Campaign Regulations and Election Violations in the 2024 Elections in Indonesia: Analysis of the Role of the ITE Law in Handling Hoaxes and Hate Speech. West Science Law and Human Rights, 3(01), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v3i01.1592

Kulikova, Y. A. (2025). The concept and types of digital technologies used in the administrative and jurisdictional process. Административное и Муниципальное Право, 1, 67–78. https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0595.2025.1.73088

Marsudianto, D. N., & Bakir, H. (2024). Reconstruction of Criminal Law to Address Cyber Terrorism in Indonesia. Journal of Social Science (JoSS), 3(11), 1962–1968. https://doi.org/10.57185/joss.v3i11.382

Mufty, A. M., Suhendar, Hasnia, H., Insani, N., & Rusyani, H. (2024). The Application of Criminal Law in Addressing Corruption Crimes: Strategies and Challenges. Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH), 3(1), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.55299/jsh.v3i1.1082

Murphy, C. (2024). Understanding cybercrime. Https://Www.Europarl.Europa.Eu/RegData/Etudes/BRIE/2024/760356/EPRS_BRI(2024)760356_EN.Pdf.

Putri, J. W. (2024). Indonesia and ASEAN Chairmanship in 2023: Leading the Region in Strengthening Relations with China. International Journal of Law and Politics Studies, 6(1), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijlps.2024.6.1.11

Rasouli, M. R., Taghvaee, A., & Mahmoudi, A. R. (2024). Formal Challenges of Criminal Liability of Legal Persons in Iran’s Criminal Justice System. Interdisciplinary Studies in Society, Law, and Politics, 3(1), 158–166. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.isslp.3.1.16

Suseno, S., Ramli, A. M., Mayana, R. F., Safiranita, T., & Aurellia Nathania Tiarma, B. (2025). Cybercrime in the new criminal code in Indonesia. Cogent Social Sciences, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2439543

Tombolotutu, R. N. F., Chandra, T. Y., & Mau, H. A. (2024). Proving Illegal Access in Combating Cybercrime in Indonesia. Journal of Law and Regulation Governance, 2(8), 260–271. https://doi.org/10.57185/jlarg.v2i8.59

Wijaya, A., & Santiago, F. (2024). Enforcement of State Law by the Republic of Indonesia Attorney General’s Office in the Perspective of Law Number 16 of 2004. Devotion : Journal of Research and Community Service, 5(6), 664–671. https://doi.org/10.59188/devotion.v5i6.741

Yulianto, A. (2021). Cybersecurity Policy and Its Implementation in Indonesia. Law Research Review Quarterly, 7(1), 69-82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/lrrq.v7i1.43191

Published

2025-03-22

How to Cite

Hasnia, H., Hafiz, A., Rasna, R., Nurahman, D., & Parhusip, J. (2025). Reconstruction of Criminal Law Policy in Handling Cyber Crime: Perspectives of Technology Law and Human Rights. Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH), 3(3), 254–264. https://doi.org/10.55299/jsh.v3i3.1328

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)