Regulating Coastal Setbacks Through Spatial Planning Law Enforcement

Main Article Content

I Gede Andi Iswarayana
I Made Suwitra
I Wayan Rideng

Abstract

This study examines the enforcement of spatial planning law in regulating coastal setback utilization in Nusa Penida, Klungkung Regency, Bali, where rapid tourism development has intensified pressure on protected coastal zones. The research aims to assess the effectiveness of legal enforcement mechanisms in controlling coastal setbacks and to identify institutional and regulatory factors that hinder compliance. An empirical legal research design is adopted, integrating statutory, conceptual, and sociological approaches. Primary data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with local government officials and relevant stakeholders, while secondary data were obtained from legislation, regional spatial planning documents, and official records. Qualitative analysis was conducted by relating normative spatial planning provisions to observed enforcement practices in the study area. The findings indicate that coastal setback regulation has not been effectively implemented, largely due to the absence of detailed spatial planning instruments, limited supervisory capacity, and reliance on administrative discretion rather than clear technical standards. These conditions weaken legal certainty and constrain the consistent application of zoning rules and sanctions. The study concludes that the formulation of detailed spatial plans and the strengthening of enforcement mechanisms are critical to improving coastal setback governance and supporting sustainable coastal management in island tourism regions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Iswarayana, I. G. A., I Made Suwitra, & I Wayan Rideng. (2026). Regulating Coastal Setbacks Through Spatial Planning Law Enforcement. Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH), 4(3), 242–247. https://doi.org/10.55299/jsh.v4i3.1793
Section
Articles

References

Beatley, T. (2009). Planning for coastal resilience: Best practices for calamitous times. Journal of Urban Affairs, 31(5), 527–544.

Black, J. (2008). Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes. Regulation & Governance, 2(2), 137–164.

Friedman, L. M. (1975). The legal system: A social science perspective. Russell Sage Foundation.

Gunningham, N., Kagan, R. A., & Thornton, D. (2003). Shades of green: Business, regulation, and environment. Stanford University Press.

Healey, P. (2007). Relational complexity and the imaginative power of strategic spatial planning. European Planning Studies, 15(4), 525–546.

Judijanto, L., Asmaret, D., Ridwan, A. S., Utomo, B., & Sahrul. (2024). Legality and implications of international law on cooperation between Indonesia and Norway in the environmental sector. Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH), 3(1).

Karina, I., Polii, J. L. S. S., Putra, I., Lubis, A. F., & Miharja, M. (2024). Analysis of the role of law in environmental dispute resolution: A case study in urban areas. Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH), 3(2).

Kay, R., & Alder, J. (2005). Coastal planning and management: New directions and challenges. Ocean & Coastal Management, 48(3–6), 225–243.

Radbruch, G. (2006). Statutory lawlessness and supra-statutory law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26(1), 1–11.

Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (Rev. ed.). Harvard University Press.

Regional Government of Klungkung Regency. (2024). Regional Regulation No. 1 of 2024 on the Regional Spatial Plan of Klungkung Regency 2024–2044.

Republic of Indonesia. (2016). Presidential Regulation No. 51 of 2016 on Coastal Setback Boundaries.

Sembiring, N. B. (2024). Land case mediation at BPN as a form of national land law development. Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH), 3(2).