Analysis of The Legal Status of Gig Workers in Indonesia’s Digital Platforms: The Urgency of Sufficient Work Regulations as Social Protection

Main Article Content

Christopher Panal Lumban Gaol
Bambang Eko Nugroho
Dadang Sumarna
Asnal Hafiz
Irsan Rahman

Abstract

The rapid expansion of Indonesia's digital economy has created approximately 41.6 million gig workers, yet their legal status remains undefined within the existing labor law framework. This study employs quantitative and normative legal analysis to examine the legal status of gig workers operating through digital platforms (Gojek, Grab, and other service applications) and evaluate the adequacy of current Indonesian labor regulations in providing social protection. Through analysis of statutory instruments including Law No. 13 of 2003 on Manpower and Law No. 11 of 2020 on Job Creation (Omnibus Law), alongside empirical data on worker demographics, income distribution, and social security participation rates, this research demonstrates that gig workers meet substantive criteria of employment yet remain classified as independent contractors. The study reveals that 7.61 percent of informal workers maintain social security coverage, with participation rates as low as 1.6 percent among gig workers specifically. Quantitative analysis of 130 gig workers across three provinces demonstrates income volatility (average monthly earnings: IDR 3.0-3.98 million), excessive working hours (30-40 hours weekly, with 20 percent exceeding 40 hours), and negligible social safety net access (49.23 percent lack health insurance). The research concludes that the Sufficient of Work doctrine, grounded in ILO conventions and the principle of decent work, provides a superior analytical framework for protecting digital platform workers. The study recommends legislative reform incorporating hybrid employment categories, mandatory social protection coverage regardless of classification, and algorithmic transparency mechanisms as essential safeguards for worker dignity and economic security in Indonesia's evolving labor market

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Lumban Gaol, C. P., Bambang Eko Nugroho, Dadang Sumarna, Asnal Hafiz, & Irsan Rahman. (2026). Analysis of The Legal Status of Gig Workers in Indonesia’s Digital Platforms: The Urgency of Sufficient Work Regulations as Social Protection. Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH), 4(3), 224–241. https://doi.org/10.55299/jsh.v4i3.1794
Section
Articles

References

Creswell, J. W. (2021). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Darmawan, E. S., Hasibuan, S. R., Permanasari, V. Y., & Kusuma, D. (2025). Disparities in health services and outcomes by National Health Insurance membership type for ischemic heart disease and stroke in Indonesia: analysis of claims, 2017–2022. Global Health Research and Policy, 10(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-025-00432-y

Delfira, S., Yusuf, M., & Sholihin, R. (2025). An Analysis of Employment Relations in the Saree Chips Home Industry: Based on the Concept of Ijarah ’Ala Al-‘Amal. MAQASIDI: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, 304–314. https://doi.org/10.47498/maqasidi.v5i2.5979

Higashi, R. T., Lee, J., Hernandez, Y., Pontón, M., Liao, J. M., Cross, K. C., & Billig, J. I. (2026). How Does Traumatic Hand Injury Impact Patients in a Safety-net Healthcare System? A Mixed Methods Study. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000003826

Indra, & Nawangsari, S. A. (2025). Legal Protection for Gig Economy Workers from the Perspective of Labor Law in Indonesia. Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Sosial, 3(1), 937–954. https://doi.org/10.51903/hakim.v3i1.2289

Komang Ayu Tri Aryani. (2026). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak-Hak Pekerja Lepas Dalam Perkembangan Gig Economy di Indonesia. Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry, 1(3), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.65310/gw9wsx40

Kougiannou, N. K., & Mendonça, P. (2025). Gig-dependent or just gigging? Examining the gig economy’s structural characteristics on food delivery couriers. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 47(7), 1065–1087. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-09-2024-0525

Makurin, A., & Kozarevych, S. (2025). DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND ITS IMPACT ON THE FUNCTIONING OF LABOR MARKETS. International Humanitarian University Herald. Economics and Management, 64. https://doi.org/10.32782/2413-2675/2025-64-10

Musofiana, I., & Ahmed Kheir Osman. (2025). Beyond the Streets: Rethinking Legal Protection for Exploited Street Children in Indonesia. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 10(3), 471–490. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v10i3.10526

R. Benny Riyanto, Sucihatiningsih Dian Wisika Prajanti, & Puteri, D. S. (2025). A Comparative Legal Analysis of Competition Law Protections for MSMEs in ASEAN Member States. International Law Discourse in Southeast Asia, 4(2), 151–174. https://doi.org/10.15294/ildisea.v4i2.36142

Sainger, G., & Irfan, M. (2026). Innovative Social Security Solutions for the Future of Work in Sharing Economy (pp. 125–139). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-06099-0_7

Shekhawat, V., & Khare, P. (2025). Legal Protections for Gig Workers: A Comparative Socio-legal Study of Indonesia and India. The Indonesian Journal of Socio-Legal Studies, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.54828/ijsls.2025v5n1.2

Shyiffa, S., & Hidayat, A. (2025). Constitutional Guarantee of Legal Protection for Freelance Workers from a Social Justice Perspective. Law Research Review Quarterly, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.15294/llrq.v11i2.28154

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung Alfabeta.

Zhou, Y. (2025). Migration, Precarity and Solidarity Among Migrant Platform Workers in China’s Food Delivery and Ride-Hailing Sectors (pp. 197–229). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-91262-7_8

Most read articles by the same author(s)