Analisis Yuridis Pencabutan Hak-Hak Politik Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 113 K/PID.SUS/2020)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Eradicating the crime of corruption must apply strict sanctions in order to provide a deterrent effect for corruptors, as well as being expected to reduce anyone from committing corruption. One of the latest breakthroughs is to apply additional criminal sanctions for revocation of certain rights. The formulation of the problem in this thesis is how the legal arrangements for the revocation of political rights against perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption, how criminal responsibility for perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption, how the legal considerations of judges on the revocation of political rights against perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption. The research method used is descriptive analysis that leads to normative juridical legal research, namely research conducted by referring to legal norms, namely researching library materials or secondary materials. Secondary data by processing data from primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The legal regulation on the revocation of political rights in the form of the right to be elected in public office is the implementation of the application of criminal sanctions that are extraordinary enforcement as regulated in Article 17 of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication Corruption crimes may be subject to additional penalties as referred to in Article 18 paragraph (1) letter d and Article 10 letter b number 1 of the Criminal Code concerning additional penalties. The results of the study indicate that the judge's legal considerations for the revocation of political rights against perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption are criminal acts committed cannot be a good example. At the end of its decision, the Panel of Judges imposed an additional penalty on the Defendant in the form of revocation of the right to be elected in public office for 3 (three) years after the Defendant had finished serving his main sentence.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Buku-Buku
Andi Hamzah, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2008
Binsar Nasution, Metode Penelitian Hukum Naormatif dan Perbandingan Hukum. Makalah disampaikan pada Dialog Interaktif Tentang Penelitian Hukum dan Penulisan Hukum Pada Majalah Akreditasi, Fakultas Hukum USU
Chaeruddin, Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Aditama, Jakarta, 2017
Dewi Wuria Eli. Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta, 2015
Efi Laila Kholis, Pembayaran Uang Pengganti Dalam Perkara Korupsi , Solusi Pub, Jakarta, 2010
Elwi Danil, Korupsi: Konsep, Tindak Pidana, dan Pemberantasannya. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2014
Hartanti, Evi, Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2015
Mahrus Ali. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2015
Martiman Prodjohamidjojo, Memahami Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indoesia, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta, 2017
Moeljatno, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta, 2014
Muhammad Rezza Kurniawan, “Modus Operandi Korupsi Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa Pemerintah Oleh PNS”, Jurnal Law Reform , Volume 14, Nomor 1, Tahun 2018
Peraturan Perundang-undangan
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
Undang-Undang Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
Undang-Undang Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.
Undang-Undang Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Jo Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.