Law and Application of Pancasila Principles in Interfaith Marriages in Indonesia

Main Article Content

Irsan Rahman
Darmawati. R
Rica Regina Novianty
Erni
Basrawi

Abstract

The implementation of the life of the nation and state is inextricably tied to the divine values encapsulated in Pancasila and the Constitution. However, the current reality of Indonesia's diverse nation poses a challenge to these divine values. The absence of barriers between individuals, as exemplified by their interactions and the formation of families through marriage, has resulted in the dissolution of ethnic, cultural, and religious distinctions. Consequently, some couples entering into marriage no longer consider their ethnic and cultural background as a determining factor in their relationship.The purpose of this paper is twofold: first, it aims to analyse the views of Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia on the phenomenon of interfaith marriages in Indonesia; second, it seeks to provide confirmation of the actual legal status of these marriages. In order to achieve this, this paper employs a normative legal research methodology, utilising both a statutory and conceptual approach in its investigation. From a conceptual standpoint, marriage encompasses not only its legal and private aspects, but also its religious aspects. Therefore, the state relinquishes its authority to determine the legitimacy of marriage to religious law, which, by its nature, discourages interfaith marriages. This paper concludes that Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution do not acknowledge the existence of interfaith marriages, as they are deemed incompatible with divine values. Accordingly, the judiciary should refrain from recognizing interfaith unions. To resolve legal disputes surrounding these unions, the Population Administration Act should be amended to repeal Article 35, Paragraph 1.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rahman, I., Darmawati. R, Novianty, R. R., Erni, & Basrawi. (2024). Law and Application of Pancasila Principles in Interfaith Marriages in Indonesia. Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH), 2(3), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.55299/jsh.v2i3.884
Section
Articles

References

Amir, R. (2019). Perkawinan Beda Agama di Indonesia Perspektif Hukum Islam. Jurnal Al-Qadau: Peradilan Dan Hukum Keluarga Islam, 6(1), 99. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-qadau.v6i1.9482

Arief, Barda Nawawi. (2010). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Kencana.

Azhary, M. T. (2015). Negara Hukum: Suatu Studi Tentang Prinsip- Prinsipnya Dilihat Dari Segi Hukum Islam, Implementasinya Pada Periode Negara Madinah dan Masa Kini, 5th ed. Prenada Media Grup.

Cantonia, S., & Majid, I. A. (2021). Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Perkawinan Beda Agama di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Perkawinan dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 2(6), 510–527. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v2i6.122

Dardiri, A. H., Tweedo, M., & Roihan, M. I. (2013). PERNIKAHAN BEDA AGAMA DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF ISLAM DAN HAM. Khazanah, 6(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.20885/khazanah.vol6.iss1.art8

Donigan. (2000). Introduction to Family Law, Cases and Materials. Gonzaga University School of Law.

Fathani, A. T., & Qodir, Z. (2020). AGAMA MUSUH PANCASILA? STUDI SEJARAH DAN PERAN AGAMA DALAM LAHIRNYA PANCASILA. Al-Qalam, 26(1), 117. https://doi.org/10.31969/alq.v26i1.828

Fuadi, A. B. (2022). Politik Hukum Pengaturan Keserentakan Pemilu. Jurnal Konstitusi, 18(3), 702. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk18310

Isnaeni, M. (2016). Hukum Perkawinan Indonesia. Refika Aditama.

Katry, Oktafiani & Lathifah Lanonci. (2023). “KONSEP PERNIKAHAN MENURUT PELAKU PERNIKAHAN BEDA AGAMA.” AL-MASHADIR : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Ekonomi Islam 60–70.

Nurdin, N. (2017). DELIK PENODAAN AGAMA ISLAM DI INDONESIA. International Journal Ihya’ ’Ulum Al-Din, 19(1), 129. https://doi.org/10.21580/ihya.18.1.1745

Prameswari, Rizky, D. D. & B. R. (2023). “Tinjauan Hukum Mengenai Penetapan Pengadilan Negeri Yang Mengabulkan Izin Perkawinan Pasangan Beda Agama Dihubungkan Dengan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Terkait.” Hakim 100–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51903/hakim.v1i3.1230

Putra, I. G. K. A. P. et al. (2023). “Perkawinan Berbeda Agama Di Indonesia” (2023) 3:2. Jurnal Indragiri Penelitian Multidisiplin 63–72.

Rahmawati, N. N. (2019). “PENGESAHAN PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA DALAM PERSFEKTIF HUKUM HINDU.”

Rizqon, R. (2022). Analisis Perkawinan Beda Agama Perspektif KHI, HAM dan CLD-KHI. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 4(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v4i1.1499

Shaleh, A. I., & Wisnaeni, F. (2019). HUBUNGAN AGAMA DAN NEGARA MENURUT PANCASILA DAN UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 1945. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 1(2), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v1i2.237-249

Syafrinaldi -, S.-& E. S. (2019). HAK ASASI MANUSIA DAN DEMOKRASI DALAM KONSEP NEGARA HUKUM (THE CONCEPT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, DEMOCRACY AND THE RULE OF LAW). ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT, HISTORY AND HERITAGE 3:1.

Tantan Hermansah, Kiky Rizky, N. M. P. (2021). Problematika Sosial dan Keagamaan Dalam Keluarga Beda Agama Di desa Sendangmulyo Kabupaten Kulon Progo Yogyakarta. Alamtara: Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Penyiaran Islam, 5(2), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.58518/alamtara.v5i2.761

Tohari, I., & Hazyimara, K. (2023). Status Hak Waris Perkawinan Beda Agama di Indonesia Perspektif Yuris Islam Klasik Dan Kontemporer. Peradaban Journal of Law and Society, 2(1), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.59001/pjls.v2i1.75

Wahyudani, Z., S. Mukhlas, O., & Abdul Hakim, A. (2023). Aspek Pidana Dalam Hukum Keluarga Dan Penyelesaiannya Pada Lembaga Hukum Di Indonesia. Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan Dan Hukum Pidana Islam, 8(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.32505/legalite.v8i1.6197

Wijayanto, E. (2023). KONVERGENSI POLITIK HUKUM, HAK ASASI MANUSIA DAN PANCASILA TERHADAP PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA DI INDONESIA. WICARANA, 2(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.57123/wicarana.v2i1.31

Yohen, Samantha Maria, L. C. S. & M. R. S. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Pernikahan Beda Agama di Indonesia. 9:1 VERITAS 27–35.