Public Trust Crisis in the Judicial System: An Institutional and Implementative Analysis

Main Article Content

Girly Farsyadiva Althaira Nurahim
Nandang Sambas

Abstract

Public trust is the primary foundation for the sustainability of the judicial legal system in a democratic rule-of-law state. A judicial system trusted by the public not only functions as a mechanism for dispute resolution and law enforcement but also serves as a source of state legitimacy in ensuring justice, legal certainty, and the protection of human rights. However, in recent decades, the judicial legal system in various countries, including Indonesia, has faced an increasingly pronounced crisis of public trust. This crisis is reflected in negative public perceptions regarding judicial independence, the integrity of law enforcement officials, and the quality of court decisions, which are considered not yet fully reflective of substantive justice. This study aims to analyze the institutional and implementative factors that contribute to the crisis of public trust in the judicial legal system. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, through an examination of legal norms, doctrines, and contemporary scholarly literature. The findings indicate that the public trust crisis stems from weak institutional integrity, low transparency and accountability, and the gap between legal norms and judicial practice. Therefore, strengthening institutional reform and improving the implementation of law enforcement are essential prerequisites for restoring public trust in the judicial legal sys

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nurahim, G. F. A., & Sambas, N. (2026). Public Trust Crisis in the Judicial System: An Institutional and Implementative Analysis. Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH), 4(3), 153–158. https://doi.org/10.55299/jsh.v4i3.2011
Section
Articles

References

Asshiddiqie, J. (2022). Law, Constitution, and Democracy (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2022).

Asshiddiqie, J. (2023). The Indonesian Constitution and Constitutionalism (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2023).

Beetham, D. (2020). The Legitimation of Power (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020).

Bingham, T. (2021). The Rule of Law (London: Penguin Books, 2021).

Bovens, M., Goodin, R. E., & Schillemans, T. (2022). The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022).

Cappelletti, M., & Bryant Garth. (2020). Access to Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).

Chemerinsky, E. (2022). Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies (New York: Wolters Kluwer, 2022).

Fisher, J., & Vernon Bogdanor, McLean, I. (2020). ‘Trust, Legitimacy and the Judiciary in Democratic Governance’, International Journal of Law in Context, 16.4 (2020), 417–432.

Garoupa, Nuno, and T. G. (2021). Judicial Reputation: A Comparative Theory (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2021).

Garoupa, Nuno, and T. G. (2022). ‘Judicial Independence and Public Trust’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 18 (2022), 45–63.

Habermas, J. (2021). Between Facts and Norms (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2021).

Hirschl, R. (2020). Comparative Matters: The Renaissance of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).

Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., & Murray, K. H. (2021). ‘Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Trust in Justice Institutions’, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 111.2 (2021), 295–327.

Kelsen, H. (2020). Pure Theory of Law, reprint edn (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2020).

Marzuki, P. M. (2020). Legal Research (Jakarta: Kencana, 2020).

Posner, R. A. (2022). The Federal Judiciary: Strengths and Weaknesses (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2021).

Project, W. J. (2023). Rule of Law Index 2023 (Washington, DC: World Justice Project, 2023).

Rawls, J. (2020). A Theory of Justice, revised edn (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2020).

Tyler, T. R. (2020). Why People Obey the Law, revised edn (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2020).

Zurn, C. F. (2020). ‘Deliberative Democracy and Judicial Legitimacy’, Law and Philosophy, 39.4 (2020), 395–423.