Notary Liability for Authentic Deeds after the Expiration of the Term of Office

Main Article Content

Michael Jose Rizal
Putu Ayu Sriasih Wesna
Anak Agung Istri Agung

Abstract

Notaries are public officials authorized to draw up authentic deeds with conclusive evidentiary force. However, the expiration of a notary's term of office raises questions concerning the continuing liability for deeds that are subsequently found to be legally defective. This study analyzes the legal requirements and procedures for drawing up authentic deeds and develops a framework for notarial liability after the notary has left office. It employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Primary and secondary legal materials were collected through library research and analyzed using systematic, comparative and forward-looking interpretation, content analysis, and deductive reasoning. The findings show that the authenticity of a deed depends on the fulfillment of requirements concerning the official's authority, the prescribed form and procedure, the legal capacity of the appearing parties, witnesses, reading aloud, and signing, as stipulated in the Notary Office Law. Depending on the nature of the defect, non-compliance may downgrade the deed's evidentiary force, render it voidable, or make it null and void by operation of law. The expiration of the term of office does not extinguish liability for deeds drawn up while the notary was in office. Liability must be based on fault, loss, causation, and the nature of the violation, and may take civil, criminal, administrative, or ethical forms according to the character of the conduct. Strengthening audits of notarial protocols before their handover is necessary to prevent disputes arising after the notary has left office.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rizal, M. J., Putu Ayu Sriasih Wesna, & Anak Agung Istri Agung. (2026). Notary Liability for Authentic Deeds after the Expiration of the Term of Office. Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH), 5(3), 439–450. https://doi.org/10.55299/jsh.v5i3.2064
Section
Articles

References

Adjie, H. (2008). Hukum notaris Indonesia: Tafsir tematik terhadap UU No. 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris. Refika Aditama.

Darmayenti, & Khairani. (2024). Tanggung jawab notaris terhadap akta yang cacat hukum menurut Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris. Unes Journal of Swara Justisia, 8(1), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v8i1.483

Engracia, M. D., & Santoso, B. (2023). Aturan batasan wajar pembuatan akta notaris beserta akibat hukumnya. Notarius, 16(1), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v16i1.39339

Hartono, N. M., & Raisah, K. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban notaris dalam pembuatan akta berkaitan dengan pertanahan. Notarius, 16(1), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v16i1.38986

Ivena, S. F., Saptanti, N., & Kusumawati, E. D. (2026). Notary responsibility in making a deed of statement of resolution of the GMS: Problems and legal consequences (Study of Decision No. 373/Pdt.G/2022/PN Jkt.Sel). Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH), 5(1), 106–114. https://doi.org/10.55299/jsh.v5i1.1953

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.

Marzuki, P. M. (2011). Penelitian hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Mertokusumo, S. (2006). Hukum acara perdata Indonesia. Liberty.

Noor El Islam, M., Sukirno, & Prabandari, A. (2021). Tanggungjawab notaris atas akta yang dibuatnya ditinjau berdasarkan hukum pidana. Notarius, 14(2), 892–904. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v14i2.43780

Oklahoma Amanda, B. (2022). The principle of notary prudence in making a perfect deed. Recital Review, 4(1), 218–243. https://doi.org/10.22437/rr.v4i1.13815

Prabhawisnu, A. A. G. K., Sujana, I. N., & Wesna, P. A. S. (2023). Notary authority in certifying electronic transaction documents. Journal of Political and Legal Sovereignty, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.38142/jpls.v1i2.64

Prianto, A., Halim, A. N., & Kumala, Y. C. (2024). Kepastian hukum kekuatan akta otentik terhadap para penghadap yang mengandung klausula eksonerasi dikaitkan dengan tanggung jawab notaris. SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 3(3), 1191–1199. https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v3i3.2404

Putri, A. R. R., Yunanto, & Sukma, N. M. (2021). Analisis yuridis terhadap penulisan akta notaris dalam sela-sela kosong buku pendaftaran akta. Notarius, 14(2), 666–680. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v14i2.43719

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor 84/PUU-XXII/2024.

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar Nomor 261/Pdt.G/2016/PN Dps.

Sabrina, R. R., & Musyafah, A. A. (2024). Pertanggung jawaban notaris dalam kesalahan pembuatan akta. Notarius, 17(2), 731–748. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v17i2.54095

Samosir, T., Harlina, I., & Vicky. (2024). Implications for the power of attorney to sell deed made by a notary due to inaccuracy. Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH), 3(2), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.55299/jsh.v3i2.1090

Santoso, E. A., & Priyono, F. X. J. (2023). Analisis yuridis autentisitas akta notaris yang dipalsukan. Notarius, 16(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v16i1.37244

Sjaifurrachman, & Adjie, H. (2011). Aspek pertanggungjawaban notaris dalam pembuatan akta. Mandar Maju.

Sugiana, S., Wesna, P. A. S., & Agung, A. A. I. (2024). Position of the premises in the authentic deed made by the notary. Journal of Political and Legal Sovereignty, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.38142/jpls.v2i3.243

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2004 Nomor 117, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4432.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 3, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5491.