Corporate Legal Responsibility for Carbon Emission Disclosure and Environmental Litigation Risk in the Green Economy Era

Main Article Content

Martono Anggusti

Abstract

Climate change has transformed corporate environmental responsibility from a voluntary corporate social responsibility practice into an increasingly enforceable legal and governance obligation. This article examines corporate legal responsibility for carbon emission disclosure and the associated environmental litigation risk in Indonesia’s green economy transition. Using normative qualitative legal research, it analyzes statutory and regulatory frameworks, including Law No. 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management, Law No. 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Companies, Law No. 16 of 2016 on the Paris Agreement, Law No. 7 of 2021 on Harmonization of Tax Regulations, Presidential Regulation No. 98 of 2021 on Carbon Economic Value, and OJK sustainable finance regulations. The findings reveal that although Indonesia has established a fragmented but expanding legal basis for carbon disclosure and carbon pricing, the absence of uniform mandatory verification standards creates legal uncertainty. Corporations face administrative, civil, and criminal liability, as well as climate-related litigation for non-disclosure, inaccurate disclosure, or greenwashing. Board members may be personally liable under corporate fiduciary duties. The article recommends integrating carbon disclosure into binding corporate reporting standards, strengthening third-party assurance, clarifying directors’ duties, and developing specialized environmental courts or chambers to manage climate litigation. These reforms are essential to align corporate conduct with Indonesia’s net-zero ambitions and reduce systemic litigation risk in the green economy era.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Anggusti, M. (2024). Corporate Legal Responsibility for Carbon Emission Disclosure and Environmental Litigation Risk in the Green Economy Era. Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH), 3(2), 216–227. https://doi.org/10.55299/jsh.v3i2.2108
Section
Articles

References

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Duan, D., Wei, R., Wang, C., & Xia, B. (2025). Opportunity or obstacle? Climate risk disclosure and corporate ESG performance. International Review of Economics & Finance, 100, 104101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104101

Hanugalih Elda Agustina, Nurul Aini, Taufiq Riyadi, & Nurus Saudah. (2024). The Influence of Green Accounting, Carbon Emission Disclosure and Environmental Performance on Firm Value. Proceeding of the International Conference on Economics, Accounting, and Taxation, 1(2), 468–479. https://doi.org/10.61132/iceat.v1i2.128

He, R., Zhou, M., Liu, J., & Yang, Q. (2021). Female Directors and Carbon Information Disclosure: Evidence from China. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2021, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7772601

Hock, B., & Dávid-Barrett, E. (2022). The compliance game: Legal endogeneity in anti-bribery settlement negotiations. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 71, 100560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2022.100560

Hutchison, C. (2023). To Whom Are Directors’ Duties Owed? Evidence from Canadian M&A Transactions. McGill Law Journal, 68(2), 123–159. https://doi.org/10.26443/law.v68i2.1291

Kristari, D. M., & Teruna, A. Y. (2023). Impact of Carbon Emission Disclosure and Corporate Social Responsibility on Indonesian Manufacturing Companies. Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT), 5(1Sp), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.34306/att.v5i1Sp.320

Leniwati, D., Handayani, N. F., Wicaksono, A. P. N., & Wahyuni, E. D. (2023). Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure, Environmental Performance, and Corporate Profitability: Green Innovation as Intervening Variable. AFRE (Accounting and Financial Review), 6(3), 384–393. https://doi.org/10.26905/afr.v6i3.11362

Li, Z. (2022a). Judicial Review of Directors’ Duty of Care: A Comparison Between U.S. & China. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 83(3). https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2022.864

Li, Z. (2022b). Judicial Review of Directors’ Duty of Care: A Comparison Between U.S. & China. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4232576

Lim, E. (2022). Directors’ Liability and Climate Risk: White Paper on Hong Kong. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3983447

Maryanti, E., & Jannah, E. (2024). GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ON CARBON EMISSION DISCLOSURE AND COMPANY PERFORMANCE. Journal of Economic and Economic Policy, 1(3), 158–181. https://doi.org/10.61796/ijecep.v1i3.42

Murdianingrum, S. L., Zuhrohtun, Z., Mulyanto, I. H., Susanto, H., Maradidya, A., & Maheresmi, H. (2024). Exploring The Impact of Green Accounting and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure on Firm Value Through Profitability In Mining Companies In Indonesia. Asian Journal of Social and Humanities, 2(5), 1133–1147. https://doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v2i5.245

Setiawan, T., Ahalik, A., Hakki, T. W., & Novanto, Y. (2024). The Antecedents of Carbon Emission Disclosure With Carbon Knowledge as Moderation. Journal of Accounting and Finance Management, 5(4), 714–723. https://doi.org/10.38035/jafm.v5i4.712