Blockchain Technology for Employment Healt Insurance Department: Adaptation Isues

https://doi.org/10.55299/ijec.v2i1.415

Authors

  • Gatotrianto B Program Studi Magister Manajemen Universitas Muhammadiyah Palopo, Indonesia
  • Salju Program Studi Magister Manajemen Universitas Muhammadiyah Palopo, Indonesia
  • Andi Nadirah Program Studi Magister Manajemen Universitas Muhammadiyah Palopo, Indonesia

Keywords:

Blockchain Technology Adoption; BPJS of Employment; TOE framework

Abstract

Blockchain technology is already being used and implemented in a number of organizational areas, including government, healthcare, banking, insurance, infrastructure, supply chain, data asset management, and education. The challenge faced by Employment BPJS is the continuation of digital technology transformation to increase membership coverage, as well as improve service quality to participants, including shortening service time. The use of a secure Blockchain system, if applied to a social security system, is of course very useful for reducing the duration of the claim process, improving data quality, reducing the risk of loss caused by human error or fraud. This research aims to identify the factors that influence organizations in adopting Blockchain technology. Next, analyze the influence of technology, organization and environment on the adoption of Blockchain technology. The population used in this study were all BPJS Ketenagakerjaan employees in 12 offices, namely 1 head office and 11 regional offices. Then, in determining the research sample, the researcher used a purposive sampling technique. The sample in this study was 150 samples. In determining the factors for adopting Blockchain technology, using the TOE framework model based on the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) with Mendeley Desktop tools to process research references. Furthermore, in a quantitative approach, data processing in this study uses Partial Least Square software (SmartPLS version 3) with a structural equation model or Structural Equation Model (SEM). The results show that technology, organization and environment have a significant and positive influence on the adoption of Blockchain technology. Likewise, the effect of adopting Blockchain technology on organizational performance. However, the organizational culture in this research model has no influence on the adoption of Blockchain technology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Rawat D., Chaudhary V., and Doku R. 2020 Blockchain Technology: Emerging Applications and Use Cases for Secure and Trustworthy Smart Systems J. Cybersecurity Priv. 1(1):4–18. doi:10.3390/jcp1010002.

Bhatiasevi V. 2020. Elucidating the determinants of business intelligence adoption and organizational performance [cited by (since 2020): 12]. Info Dev. 36(1):78–96. doi:10.1177/0266666918811394.

Employment BPJS, 2020 Facing Challenge, Strengthen Innovation, and Sustainable

Chen CL, Deng YY, Tsaur WJ, Li CT, Lee CC, Wu CM. 2021. A traceable online insurance claims system based on blockchain and smart contract technology. sustain. 13(16). doi:10.3390/su13169386.

alda MT, Gökalp E, and Alkş N. 2019. Analyzing determinants of open government-based technologies and applications adoption in the context of organizations Proc Int Conf e-Learning, e-Business, and Enterp Inf System e-Government August:50–56.

Fernando Y., Rozuar NHM, and Mergeresa F. 2021 Blockchain-enabled technology and carbon performance: insights from early adopters Technol Soc. 64 Jan:101507. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101507.

Fraga-Lamas P., Fernández-Caramés TM. 2019. Leveraging Blockchain for Sustainability and Open Innovation: A Cyber-Resilient Approach toward the EU Green Deal and UN Sustainable Development Goals December 2019:1–18

Hou B, Hong J, and Zhu R. 2019. Exploration and exploitation of innovation and firm performance: the mediation of entrepreneurial orientation and moderation of competitive intensity. june. doi:10.1108/JABS-11-2017-0206

Loukil F., Boukadi K., Hussain R., and Abed M. 2021 Ciosy: A collaborative blockchain-based insurance system electrons. 10(11). doi:10.3390/electronics10111343.

Koncheva VA, Odintsov SV, and Khmelnitski L. 2019. Blockchain in HR. 105 Iscde:787–790. doi:10.2991/iscde-19.2019.154.

Kulkarni M, Patil K. 2020. Block chain technology adoption using the TOE framework. Int J Sci Technol Res. 9(2):1109–1117.

Kumars, C. (2009). Migration and refugee issues between India and Bangladesh Scholar's Voices: A New Way of Thinking, 1(1), 64–82

Lanzini F, Ubacht J, and De Greeff J. 2021. Blockchain adoption factors for SMEs in supply chain management. J Supply Chain Management Sci. 2(1):1–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.18757/jscms.2021.5624.

Mattila V., Dwivedi P., and Gauri P. 2021 The role of blockchain in sustainable development goals (SDGs) December

Qiang X. 2021. Technical methods for accelerating the digital transformation of Chinese enterprises MATEC Web Conf. 336:09024. doi:10.1051/matecconf/202133609024.

Yadav VS, Singh AR, Raut RD, Govindarajan UH, 2020 Blockchain technology adoption barriers in the Indian agricultural supply chain: an integrated approach Conserv Recycle. April 161:104877. doi:10.1016/j. resconrec.

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Gatotrianto B, Salju, & Andi Nadirah. (2023). Blockchain Technology for Employment Healt Insurance Department: Adaptation Isues. International Journal of Economics (IJEC), 2(1), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.55299/ijec.v2i1.415