Elbow Joint Radiography with Suspection of Olecranon Process Fracture in the Hospital Columbia Asia Medan
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Elbow Joint Radiography with a suspected Olecranon Process Fracture , in order to get an optimal image requires the right equipment to support the smooth running of health services such as using a General X-ray Unit X-ray. The aim of elbow joint radiography research is to show the anatomy and obtain a radiographic picture of the elbow joint with abnormalities that occur in the elbow joint. The type of research used is descriptive qualitative research. Qualitative research techniques are research that is descriptive in nature and tends to use analysis and the subject's perspective is emphasized more. The results obtained from a radiographic examination of the elbow joint with suspected olecranon process fracture using a machine with a capacity of 500mA. In radiographs of elbow joints with suspected olecranon process fractures, it is necessary to adjust the size of the radiation field as needed so that the radiation dose received by the patient is smaller.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
P. S. Hajare, A. V Jadhav, P. H. Patil, and S. S. Das, “A Cadaveric Study of Anatomical and Radiological Correlation of Mastoid Air Cells System in Relation to its Morphology,” Indian J. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg., vol. 75, no. S1, pp. 242–249, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s12070-022-03341-5.
R. Tamura, R. Tomio, F. Mohammad, M. Toda, and K. Yoshida, “Analysis of various tracts of mastoid air cells related to CSF leak after the anterior transpetrosal approach,” J. Neurosurg., vol. 130, no. 2, pp. 360–367, 2018.
M. Z. Adışen and M. Aydoğdu, “Comparison of mastoid air cell volume in patients with or without a pneumatized articular tubercle,” Imaging Sci. Dent., vol. 52, no. 1, p. 27, 2022, doi: 10.5624/isd.20210153.
N. M. Etedali, J. A. Reetz, and J. D. Foster, “Complications and clinical utility of ultrasonographically guided pyelocentesis and antegrade pyelography in cats and dogs: 49 cases (2007–2015),” J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., vol. 254, no. 7, pp. 826–834, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.2460/javma.254.7.826.
M. Lee et al., “Role of buccal mucosa graft ureteroplasty in the surgical management of pyeloplasty failure,” Asian J. Urol., Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2023.09.001.
C. Lemieux, C. Vachon, G. Beauchamp, and M. E. Dunn, “Minimal renal pelvis dilation in cats diagnosed with benign ureteral obstruction by antegrade pyelography: a retrospective study of 82 cases (2012–2018),” J. Feline Med. Surg., vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 892–899, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1177/1098612X20983980.
L. Meomartino, A. Greco, M. Di Giancamillo, A. Brunetti, and G. Gnudi, “Imaging techniques in Veterinary Medicine. Part I: Radiography and Ultrasonography,” Eur. J. Radiol. Open, vol. 8, p. 100382, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2021.100382.
T. Tanaka, T. Shindo, K. Hashimoto, K. Kobayashi, and N. Masumori, “Management of hydronephrosis after radical cystectomy and urinary diversion for bladder cancer: A single tertiary center experience,” Int. J. Urol., vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 1046–1053, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.14970.
L. Munhoz, C. HIROSHI IIDA, R. Abdala Junior, R. Abdala, and E. S. Arita, “Mastoid Air Cell System: Hounsfield Density by Multislice Computed Tomography.,” J. Clin. Diagnostic Res., vol. 12, no. 4, 2018.
D. Rochmayanti et al., “Image Improvement and Dose Reduction on Computed Tomography Mastoid Using Interactive Reconstruction,” in Journal of Big Data, vol. 9, no. 1, SpringerOpen, 2023, pp. 103–116.
R. Tamura, R. Tomio, F. Mohammad, M. Toda, and K. Yoshida, “Analysis of various tracts of mastoid air cells related to CSF leak after the anterior transpetrosal approach,” J. Neurosurg., vol. 130, no. 2, pp. 360–367, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.3171/2017.9.JNS171622.
F. P. Machado, J. E. F. Dornelles, S. Rausch, R. J. Oliveira, P. R. Portela, and A. L. S. Valente, “Osteology of the pelvic limb of nine-banded-armadillo, dasypus novemcinctus linnaeus, 1758 applied to radiographic interpretation,” Brazilian J. Dev., vol. 9, no. 05, pp. 14686–14709, 2023.
E. G. Nordio, N. V Tumanska, and T. M. Kichangina, “Radiological investigation of the urogenital system,” 2018.
D. d’Ovidio, F. Pirrone, T. M. Donnelly, A. Greco, and L. Meomartino, “Ultrasound-guided percutaneous antegrade pyelography for suspected ureteral obstruction in 6 pet guinea pigs ( Cavia porcellus ),” Vet. Q., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 198–204, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1080/01652176.2020.1803512.
C. Yuan et al., “Ileal ureteral replacement for the management of ureteral avulsion during ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a case series,” BMC Surg., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2022.
J. M. Elmore, W. H. Cerwinka, and A. J. Kirsch, “Assessment of renal obstructive disorders: ultrasound, nuclear medicine, and magnetic resonance imaging,” in The Kelalis--King--Belman Textbook of Clinical Pediatric Urology, CRC Press, 2018, pp. 495–504.
J. J. Crivelli et al., “Clinical and radiographic outcomes following salvage intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction,” Int. braz j urol, vol. 47, pp. 1209–1218, 2021.
S. L. Purchase, “Point and shoot: a radiographic analysis of mastoiditis in archaeological populations from England’s North-East.” University of Sheffield, 2021.
G. K. DOĞAN and İ. TAKCI, “A macroanatomic, morphometric and comparative investigation on skeletal system of the geese growing in Kars region II; Skeleton appendiculare,” Black Sea J. Heal. Sci., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 6–16, 2021.
C. Casteleyn, N. Robin, and J. Bakker, “Topographical Anatomy of the Rhesus Monkey (Macaca mulatta)—Part II: Pelvic Limb,” Vet. Sci., vol. 10, no. 3, p. 172, 2023.
N. R. Sayal, S. Boyd, G. Zach White, and M. Farrugia, “Incidental mastoid effusion diagnosed on imaging: are we doing right by our patients?,” Laryngoscope, vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 852–857, 2019.
P. Salinas, A. Arenas-Caro, S. Núñez-Cook, L. Moreno, E. Curihuentro, and F. Vidal, “Estudio morfométrico, anatómico y radiográfico de los huesos del miembro pélvico del huemul patagónico en peligro de extinción (Hippocamelus bisulcus),” Int. J. Morphol., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 747–754, 2020.
D. A. Rosenfield, N. F. Paretsis, P. R. Yanai, and C. S. Pizzutto, “Gross Osteology and digital radiography of the common Capybara (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris), Carl Linnaeus, 1766 for scientific and clinical application,” Brazilian J. Vet. Res. Anim. Sci., vol. 57, no. 4, pp. e172323–e172323, 2020.
E. P. Lestari, D. D. Cahyadi, S. Novelina, and H. Setijanto, “PF-30 Anatomical Characteristic of Hindlimb Skeleton of Sumatran Rhino (Dicerorhinus sumatrensis),” Hemera Zoa, 2018.
A. Patel, F. Schnoll-Sussman, and C. P. Gyawali, “Diagnostic Testing for Esophageal Motility Disorders: Barium Radiography, High-Resolution Manometry, and the Functional Lumen Imaging Probe (FLIP),” in The AFS Textbook of Foregut Disease, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023, pp. 269–278.
S. Lampridis, S. Mitsos, M. Hayward, D. Lawrence, and N. Panagiotopoulos, “The insidious presentation and challenging management of esophageal perforation following diagnostic and therapeutic interventions,” J. Thorac. Dis., vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 2724–2734, May 2020, doi: 10.21037/jtd-19-4096.
N. R. Sayal, S. Boyd, G. Zach White, and M. Farrugia, “Incidental mastoid effusion diagnosed on imaging: Are we doing right by our patients?,” Laryngoscope, vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 852–857, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1002/lary.27452.
V. Torrecillas and J. D. Meier, “History and radiographic findings as predictors for esophageal coins versus button batteries,” Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol., vol. 137, no. 5, p. 110208, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110208.