Regulation of the Legal Liability of Notary Trainees in Maintaining the Confidentiality of Official Legal Documents during the Preparation of Authentic Deeds

Main Article Content

Made Bagus Vijanata Priadipa
I Made Suwitra
Nengah Renaya

Abstract

This study examines the regulatory vacuum concerning the legal liability of Notary trainees for maintaining the confidentiality of official legal documents during the preparation of authentic deeds. Article 16A paragraph (2) of the Notary Office Law imposes an obligation to keep confidential deeds and information obtained during the apprenticeship, yet it does not specify the forms of liability, enforcement mechanisms, types of sanctions, or the authorities empowered to impose them. This normative legal research applies statutory, conceptual, and philosophical approaches. Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials were collected through document and literature studies and analyzed through legal discovery using argumentum per analogiam and argumentum a contrario. The findings demonstrate that Article 16A paragraph (2) contains a rechtsvacuum that creates legal uncertainty for Notary trainees, supervising Notaries, and the parties concerned. This vacuum may be addressed through three forms of liability: administrative-organizational, civil, and criminal. To ensure legal certainty, Article 16A should be supplemented with provisions governing graduated sanctions, enforcement authority, compensatory liability, the possibility of joint and several liability, and the cumulative-selective application of general criminal law provisions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Priadipa, M. B. V., I Made Suwitra, & Nengah Renaya. (2026). Regulation of the Legal Liability of Notary Trainees in Maintaining the Confidentiality of Official Legal Documents during the Preparation of Authentic Deeds. Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH), 5(2), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.55299/jsh.v5i2.2055
Section
Articles

References

Adjie, H. (2008). Sanksi perdata dan administratif terhadap Notaris sebagai pejabat publik. Refika Aditama.

Budiman, R. (2023). The development of personal data protection law in Indonesia: Challenges and prospects for the implementation of Law No. 27 of 2022. Jurnal Smart Hukum, 2(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.55299/jsh.v2i1.1352

Hardani, A. L. (2021). Kewajiban menjaga kerahasiaan dalam pembuatan akta bagi calon Notaris magang. Officium Notarium, 1(1), 174–183. https://doi.org/10.20885/JON.vol1.iss1.art18

Ivena, S. F., Saptanti, N., & Kusumawati, E. D. (2026). Notary responsibility in making a deed of statement of resolution of the GMS: Problems and legal consequences (Study of Decision No. 373/Pdt.G/2022/PN Jkt.Sel). Jurnal Smart Hukum, 5(1), 106–114. https://doi.org/10.55299/jsh.v5i1.1953

Jasmine, A., Djaja, B., & Sudirman, M. (2024). Tanggung jawab Notaris dalam perlindungan data pribadi klien berdasarkan UU No. 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Pelindungan Data Pribadi. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik, 5(1), 653–662. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i1.3204

Kelsen, H. (1998). Pure theory of law (M. Knight, Trans.). University of California Press.

Kusumandari, G. N. F. (2023). Implementasi kewajiban ingkar Notaris dalam pelaksanaan tugas jabatan berdasarkan UUJN. Officium Notarium, 3(2), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.20885/JON.vol3.iss2.art2

Margiyanti, R., Negara, T. A. S., & Sjafi’i, R. I. R. (2022). Confidentiality of the notary deed in the freedom of the academic pulpit. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 13(2), 182–193. https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v13i2.5735

Marzuki, P. M. (2008). Pengantar ilmu hukum. Kencana.

Rahmatullah, H., & Ispriyarso, B. (2023). Integritas pengawasan Notaris terhadap calon Notaris magang dalam pembuatan akta otentik. Notarius, 16(2), 714–730. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v16i2.41803

Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (Rev. ed.). The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Sakinah, S., & Setyono, Y. A. (2022). Tanggung jawab perdata profesi Notaris dalam penerapan asas kerahasiaan. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 10(5), 1193–1206. https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2022.v10.i05.p18

Samosir, T., Harlina, I., & Vicky. (2024). Implications for the power of attorney to sell deed made by a Notary due to inaccuracy. Jurnal Smart Hukum, 3(2), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.55299/jsh.v3i2.1090

Santika, I. B. A. P., Renaya, N., & Mahaputra, K. Y. (2023). Notary authority as a class II auction official in the perspective of the Notary Office Act. NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan, 8(2), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.22225/jn.8.2.2023.98-104

Sari, E. J. (2022). Implementasi hukum hak ingkar Notaris terhadap kerahasiaan isi akta Notaris. Officium Notarium, 2(1), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.20885/JON.vol2.iss1.art8

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2013). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. Rajawali Pers.

Wesna, P. A. S., Suwitra, I. M., & Atmaja, P. W. (2023). The form of officer of land deed officer (PPAT) in distribution of rights to land joint assets post divorce. Jurnal Akta, 10(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v10i1.27506

Wirawan, Y., & Pujiono. (2022). Peranan saksi instrumenter dalam perkara pidana terkait pembuatan akta Notaris (Studi kasus Perkara Nomor 25/Pid.Sus-TPK/2020/PN.Pdg). Notarius, 15(2), 738–756. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v15i2.37289

Yetniwati, Yahya, T., & Pahlefi. (2021). Legal constructions of apprenticeship for Notary candidates in the framework of rechtsidee. Jambe Law Journal, 4(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.22437/jlj.4.1.93-110

Zulfan, M. (2022). Perlindungan hukum bagi calon Notaris yang magang di kantor Notaris yang tidak direkomendasikan oleh Pengurus Wilayah Ikatan Notaris Indonesia. Officium Notarium, 1(3), 536–542. https://doi.org/10.20885/JON.vol1.iss3.art14

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (Wetboek van Strafrecht), ketentuan Pasal 322 (rujukan historis tesis).

Kode Etik Notaris, hasil Kongres Luar Biasa Ikatan Notaris Indonesia, 29–30 Mei 2015.

Peraturan Perkumpulan Ikatan Notaris Indonesia Nomor 19/PERKUM/INI/2019 tentang Magang.

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 134 K/Pid/2020.

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 41 PK/Pid/2021.

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Semarang Nomor 773/Pid.B/2021/PN.Smg.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Pelindungan Data Pribadi.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana sebagaimana telah diubah terakhir dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2026.