Algorithmic Nudging and Employee Well-being: A Mixed-Methods Study on the Double-Edged Sword of AI-Driven Management in the Hybrid Work Era

Main Article Content

H Abd Rahman
Sulfiani Sulfiani
A Syafir Rahman
Kamaruddin
Andi

Abstract

Algorithmic nudging through artificial intelligence-driven management has emerged as a transformative force in contemporary hybrid workplaces, offering unprecedented opportunities for personalized performance optimization while simultaneously raising critical concerns about employee autonomy and psychological well-being. This mixed-methods study examined 87 white-collar professionals from Indonesian technology, financial services, and consulting firms to elucidate the complex relationship between algorithmic nudging, job burnout, perceived threat, and workforce well-being. Drawing upon self-determination theory and conservation of resources theory, the study integrated in-depth qualitative interviews (n=32) with quantitative burnout assessments employing the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Results revealed a curvilinear relationship whereby moderate algorithmic nudging implementations demonstrated positive effects on competence satisfaction and task clarity, whereas intensive surveillance and real-time algorithmic interventions paradoxically increased emotional exhaustion and cynicism by undermining autonomy and relatedness. Person-job fit emerged as a critical moderator, with individuals in roles aligned with algorithmic management exhibiting 34% lower burnout compared to misaligned counterparts. The study identified three primary mechanisms through which algorithmic nudging influences well-being: resource depletion (through psychological pressure), autonomy suppression (through constrained decision-making), and relatedness erosion (through surveillance-induced isolation). Contextual factors including organizational transparency, employee agency in system design, and hybrid work flexibility substantially buffered negative effects. These findings suggest that algorithmic nudging represents a double-edged sword requiring calibrated implementation, genuine employee participation in system governance, and human-centric safeguards to maximize productivity gains while protecting psychological well-being in the hybrid work erav

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rahman, H. A., Sulfiani Sulfiani, A Syafir Rahman, Kamaruddin, & Andi. (2026). Algorithmic Nudging and Employee Well-being: A Mixed-Methods Study on the Double-Edged Sword of AI-Driven Management in the Hybrid Work Era. International Journal of Economics (IJEC), 5(1), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.55299/ijec.v5i1.1797
Section
Articles

References

Ahmed, Shaik Mudassir. 2026. “The Convergence of Artificial Intelligence, Consumer Psychology, and Marketing Strategy in the Digital Age.” International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management 10 (01): 221–28. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM.NCDTAIM032.

Alsamarra’I, Zeena, Niki Panteli, and Blooma John. 2025. “Emerging Leadership Practices for Hybrid Work: The Role of Algorithmic Management Tools.” Australasian Journal of Information Systems 29 (July). https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v29.4909.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2017. “Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2017.”

Creswell, J. W. 2021. “Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th Ed.). SAGE Publications.”

Joshi, Rakesh, Varinder Singh, and Umesh Sehgal. 2025. “A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Enabled Data Driven Decision Making in Management and IT.” Journal of Neonatal Surgery 13 (September):1334–42. https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v13i1.9260.

Lazarova, Mila Borislavova, Mihaela Dimitrova, Betina Agata Szkudlarek, Christine Han, Viktoriya Voloshyna, Jelena Zikic, Dunja Palic, et al. 2025. “Firm and Individual Level Processes Shaping Migrant and Refugee Integration.” Academy of Management Proceedings 2025 (1). https://doi.org/10.5465/AMPROC.2025.16468symposium.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. 2014. “Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd Ed.). SAGE Publications.”

Ngonini, Xolani. 2025. “Exploring Hybrid Work Dynamics in Public Organizations: Remote Work and Blended Office-Home Arrangements.” In . https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1009811.

Recchi, Sara, Giovanna Fullin, Valentina Pacetti, and Anne-Iris Romens. 2025. “Models of Hybrid Work: Implementing Remote Work in Post-Pandemic Times.” STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI, no. 2 (December), 90–119. https://doi.org/10.3280/SO2025-002004.

Standage, Martyn, Richard M. Ryan, and Thomas Curran. 2025. “Self-Determination Theory Applied to Physical Education: The Role of Self-Regulatory Processes in Facilitating High-Quality Student Motivation, Engagement, and Well-Being.” In Motivation in Physical Education, 29–51. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-86908-2_2.

Sugiyono. 2019. “Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. Bandung Alfabeta.”

Wusono, Medi, Mira Yona, Yannik Ariyati, Rahman Hasibuan, Hanafi Siregar, Habibuddin Nasution, Wilmar Simanjuntak, Peromikha Barus, and Siti Yolanda. 2025. “Algorithmic Management and Employee Autonomy: Impacts on Creativity in Remote First Companies.” Journal of Economics and Management Scienties, November, 315–21. https://doi.org/10.37034/jems.v8i1.288.