Legal Protection for Notaries in Controversies over Deeds Suspected of Forgery

Main Article Content

Ida Ayu Mas Sri Patni
I Ketut Kasta Arya Wijaya
I Wayan Kartika Jaya Utama

Abstract

This study analyzes the forms of legal protection available to Notaries when deeds they draw up are subsequently suspected of containing elements of forgery and determines the legal consequences for such deeds. It employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials were collected through a literature review and analyzed qualitatively using descriptive-analytical and evaluative methods. The findings show that legal protection for Notaries includes preventive protection through the regulation of official powers and duties, the principle of due care, the right of refusal, professional confidentiality, and the approval mechanism of the Notary Honorary Council; and remedial protection through evidentiary proceedings in which the Notary's fault and involvement constitute the basis of liability. Indications of forgery do not automatically eliminate a deed's authenticity. A deed retains its status as an authentic deed when the formal requirements have been fulfilled and the Notary neither knew of nor participated in the forgery. Conversely, a defect in the subjective requirements renders the agreement voidable, whereas a defect in the objective requirements may render it null and void by operation of law. The novelty of this study lies in a tiered test that links the source of the forgery, the Notary's formal compliance, the form of fault, and the type of contractual defect to determine the protection afforded to the Notary and the legal consequences for the deed

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Patni, I. A. M. S., I Ketut Kasta Arya Wijaya, & I Wayan Kartika Jaya Utama. (2026). Legal Protection for Notaries in Controversies over Deeds Suspected of Forgery. Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH), 5(3), 427–438. https://doi.org/10.55299/jsh.v5i2.2063
Section
Articles

References

Adjie, H. (2008). Hukum Notaris Indonesia: Tafsir tematik terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris. Refika Aditama.

Adjie, H. (2011). Kebatalan dan pembatalan akta Notaris. Refika Aditama.

Budiono, H. (2013). Kumpulan tulisan hukum perdata di bidang kenotariatan: Buku kedua. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Depriani, W., Ridwan, R., & Trisaka, A. (2021). Perlindungan hukum Notaris pengganti yang tidak mengetahui adanya identitas palsu dari para pihak sedangkan Notaris yang digantikan meninggal dunia. Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan, 10(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.28946/rpt.v10i1.949

Hadjon, P. M. (1987). Perlindungan hukum bagi rakyat Indonesia. Bina Ilmu.

Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris.

Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Nomor 17 Tahun 2021 tentang Tugas dan Fungsi, Syarat dan Tata Cara Pengangkatan dan Pemberhentian, Struktur Organisasi, Tata Kerja, dan Anggaran Majelis Kehormatan Notaris.

Indonesia. (2023). Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.

Indonesia. (2025). Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2025 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.

Ivena, S. F., Saptanti, N., & Kusumawati, E. D. (2026). Notary responsibility in making a deed of statement of resolution of the GMS: Problems and legal consequences (Study of Decision No. 373/Pdt.G/2022/PN Jkt.Sel). Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH), 5(1), 106–114. https://doi.org/10.55299/jsh.v5i1.1953

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata [Burgerlijk Wetboek].

Lumban Tobing, G. H. S. (1983). Peraturan jabatan Notaris. Erlangga.

Maharani, N. P. A. B. D., Puspadma, I. N. A., & Utama, I. W. K. J. (2023). Perlindungan hukum bagi Notaris pengganti dalam hal pemanggilan berkaitan dengan kepentingan proses peradilan pidana. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 5(1), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.5.1.2023.61-66

Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian hukum. Prenada Media.

Prasetyawati, B. I., & Prananingtyas, P. (2022). Peran kode etik Notaris dalam membangun integritas Notaris di era 4.0. Notarius, 15(1), 310–323. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v15i1.46043

Pratama, I. P., Wisnaeni, F., & Cahyaningtyas, I. (2021). Tanggung jawab Notaris terhadap kewajibannya dalam hal pembacaan akta. Notarius, 14(2), 809–817. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v14i2.43806

Puspitasari, A. M., & Efendi, A. (2022). Perlindungan hukum Notaris pengganti dalam pemeriksaan sebagai saksi di pengadilan berdasarkan rahasia jabatan Notaris. Jurnal Kajian Konstitusi, 2(2), 124–156. https://doi.org/10.19184/jkk.v2i2.33974

Qodarrahman, A., Febrian, F., & Sagita, A. (2022). Tanggung jawab Notaris terhadap akta yang dibuat terkait pemalsuan tanda tangan penghadap oleh Notaris. Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan, 11(2), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.28946/rpt.v11i2.2434

Rahardjo, L., & Ismelina, M. (2025). Legal protection of Notaries against acts against the law on false testimony by presenters. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 5(3), 2205–2215. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i3.1396

Raihan, I., & Hertanto, H. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Notaris terhadap pemalsuan tanda tangan penghadap atas akta kuasa jual beli: Studi Putusan Nomor 773/Pid.B/2021/PN.Smg. Unes Journal of Swara Justisia, 8(1), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v8i1.475

Sabrina, R. R., & Musyafah, A. A. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Notaris dalam kesalahan pembuatan akta. Notarius, 17(2), 731–748. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v17i2.54095

Sakina, N., & Santoso, B. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Notaris dalam pembuatan akta otentik yang mengandung keterangan palsu. Notarius, 17(3), 2415–2429. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v17i3.47166

Samosir, T., Harlina, I., & Vicky. (2024). Implications for the power of attorney to sell deed made by a Notary due to inaccuracy. Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH), 3(2), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.55299/jsh.v3i2.1090

Santoso, E. A., & Priyono, F. J. (2023). Analisis yuridis autentisitas akta Notaris yang dipalsukan. Notarius, 16(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v16i1.37244

Subekti, R. (2005). Hukum perjanjian. Intermasa.

Vergano, R., & Retnaningsih, S. (2022). Ruang lingkup tanggung jawab Notaris terhadap keterangan palsu yang termuat pada akta autentik. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 10(4), 782–793. https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2022.v10.i04.p06

Wulandari, N. M. N., & Wijaya, I. K. K. A. (2024). Juridical review of criminal law arrangements in document forgery cases. Pemuliaan Keadilan, 2(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.62383/pk.v2i1.406

Yetniwati, Y., Yahya, T., & Amir, D. (2021). Perlindungan hukum terhadap Notaris penerima protokol: Bentuk dan batasan. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 4(1), 213–244. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.4.1.213-244