Ethics of Scientific Writing and Publication in Higher Education: A Qualitative Analysis
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This qualitative research examines the implementation of ethics in scientific writing and publication practices in higher education institutions to strengthen academic integrity and improve the quality of scholarly publications among university students. Involving 50 students, 4 lecturers, 3 journal reviewers, and 2 academic administrators from the Faculty of Indonesian Language and Literature Education at Universitas Graha Nusantara, the study employed mixed qualitative methods including structured observations (8 academic writing sessions), semi-structured interviews (9 participants), focus group discussions (2 sessions with 30 students), document analysis, plagiarism screening reports, and student reflective journals over a four-month period. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis with open and axial coding procedures to identify patterns in students’ understanding of academic ethics, publication responsibility, and scientific writing practices. Results revealed significant improvements in students’ academic writing ethics across six dimensions: citation and referencing skills (8-student increase to Proficient level), plagiarism awareness (12-student increase), ethical use of research sources (10-student increase), scientific argumentation (Advanced category achievement), publication responsibility (38 students in Advanced category), and academic integrity commitment (5-student progression to Highly Proficient level). Thematic analysis identified six primary themes: increased awareness of academic honesty (24 occurrences), improved scientific writing quality (28 occurrences), responsible publication practices (31 occurrences), ethical challenges in digital academic environments (26 occurrences), collaborative academic supervision (29 occurrences), and implementation barriers in academic writing culture (17 occurrences). The study demonstrates that strengthening ethics education in scientific writing and publication effectively develops students’ academic responsibility while fostering integrity, professionalism, and credibility in higher education environments.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Albertyn, R. (2025). Issues of authorship threatening research integrity: Pointers for ethical publication practices. South African Journal of Higher Education, 39(5), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.20853/39-5-6611
Chaaban, Y. (2025). Exploring research ethics through the lens of critical posthumanism in the age of Artificial Intelligence. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2025.2465995
Chetwynd, E. (2024). Ethical use of artificial intelligence for scientific writing: Current trends. Journal of Human Lactation, 40(2), 215–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344241235160
Cruz-Rizo, L., & Matos-Hernández, E. C. (2025). To improve scientific publishing in higher education: An ethical-collaborative writing strategy. Science Portal, 6(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.51247/pdlc.v6i3.624
Demeter, E., McBride, A., Holladay-Sandidge, H., Rasmussen, L. M., Bensadoun, E., & Greene, M. (2025). Intervention to promote ethical authorship practices in graduate education. Science and Engineering Ethics, 31(22), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-025-00548-x
Dineen, K., & Goff, L. (2024). Two sides of the same coin: A taxonomy of academic integrity and impropriety using intellectual virtues and vices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(7), 935–947. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2340641
Golding, J., & Ince, A. (2024). Ethical issues in researching higher education teaching and learning. Encyclopedia, 4(3), 1147–1162. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4030074
Hosseini, M., Resnik, D. B., & Holmes, K. (2023). The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts. Research Ethics, 19(4), 449–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161231180449
Karabag, S. F., Berggren, C., Pielaszkiewicz, J., & Gerdin, B. (2025). Minimizing questionable research practices: The role of norms, counter norms, and micro-organizational ethics discussion. Journal of Academic Ethics, 23, 113–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09520-z
Le, T. T., & Pham, T. T. (2026). Writing-With integrity: Reimagining research ethics through relational practice. Research Ethics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161261419550
Plevris, V. (2025). From integrity to inflation: Ethical and unethical citation practices in academic publishing. Journal of Academic Ethics, 23, 1847–1877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-025-09631-1
Saksono, H. (2025). Navigating the new academic reality: Adaptive AI governance and ethics in global scientific publishing. Jurnal Bina Praja, 17(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.17.2025-3090
Smith, J. J., Payne, B. H., Klassen, S., Doyle, D. T., & Fiesler, C. (2022). Incorporating ethics in computing courses: Perspectives from educators. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3501385.3543961
Zhou, K. Z., Kilhoffer, Z., Sanfilippo, M. R., Underwood, T., Gumusel, E., Wei, M., Choudhry, A., & Xiong, J. (2024). “The teachers are confused as well”: A multiple-stakeholder ethics discussion on large language models in computing education. arXiv Preprint, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.12453
Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holmes, W., & Nemorin, S. (2024). The ethics of AI in education. arXiv Preprint, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.11842