The Reliability and Validity of an Instrument to Evaluate the Implementation of Professional Learning Communities (PLC)

Main Article Content

Thiru Kali Thevi Jayaraman
Nor Hasnida Bt Che Md Ghazali

Abstract

The implementation of Profesional Learning Communities (PLC) among secondary school teachers can enhance school capacity and excellence. To assess the execution of PLC, a reliable and valid instrument is necessary. This research aimed to develop and validate such an instrument, which was distributed to 69 secondary school teachers in the form of a questionnaire. The Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) Evaluation Model, established by Daniel Stufflebeam, served as the foundation for the instrument. The content validity of the instrument was examined by experts, while the construct validity was assessed using internal consistency reliability or Cronbach Alpha. The pilot study findings suggest that the instrument is both reliable and valid, with 87 out of 91 items retained.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Thiru Kali Thevi Jayaraman, & Nor Hasnida Bt Che Md Ghazali. (2023). The Reliability and Validity of an Instrument to Evaluate the Implementation of Professional Learning Communities (PLC). International Journal of Educational Research Excellence (IJERE), 2(1), 48–68. https://doi.org/10.55299/ijere.v2i1.394
Section
Articles

References

Abdullah, Z. (2021). Fostering the Development of a Professional Learning Community: A Case Study in a Malaysian Secondary School. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 8(1), 1-11. doi: 10.20448/journal.509.2021.81.1.11

Blueprint Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Diperoleh daripada http://www.moe.gov.my/userfiles/file/PPP/Preliminary-BlueprintExecSummary-

D. Muijs, “Doing Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS”, London, Sage Publication Ltd, 2011.

Ghazali Darusalam & Sufean Hussin, 2018. Metodologi Penyelidikan Dalam Pendidikan: Amalan dan Analisis Kajian

Hair, J. F., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. C. (2018). Multivariate data analysis. 8thEd. United Kingdom: Cengage Learning

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). London: Cengage Learning EMEA

Hipp, K. K., & Huffman, J. B. (2003). Professional learning community assessment. In J. B. Huffman, & K. K. Hipp (Eds.),

Reculturing schools as professional learning communities (pp. 70-74). Lanham, MD: The Scarecrow Press.

Hoque, A.S.M.M., Awang, Z., Jusoff, K., Salleh, F., & Muda, H. (2017). Social business efficiency: Instrument development and validation procedure using structural equation modelling. International Business Management, 11(1), 222-231.

Hord, S. (1997). Professional Learning Communities. Communities of Continuous Inquiry and Improvement. Texas; SEDL

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013- 2025.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2014). Pelan pembangunan profesionalisme berterusan guru dan pemimpin sekolah. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

Koo, T.K., & Li, M.Y. (2016). A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155-163. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012

Siti Nafsiah Ismail, (2019). Reka bentuk model komuniti pembelajaran profesional dan pengajaran berkesan guru bahasa melayu Malaysia. Universiti Malaya, kuala Lumpur.

Zainuddin Awang, 2015. A Gentle Approach to Learning Structural Equation Modelling. MPWS Rich Publication