Analysis of Zoning System Implementation Policies in The Admission of New Students of Junior High School in Sukabumi City
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The admission of the new students (PPDB) zoning system start to be enforced in Indonesia through the Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture (Permendikbud) No. 17 of 2017. This policy applies to all City and Regency Education Offices in Indonesia. The policy applies in Sukabumi City in 2018 due to the readiness of human resources, infrastructure, and financial resources owned by Sukabumi City. The purpose of this study is to find out how the implementation of the zoning system policy in accepting new students, as well as the inhibiting factors in achieving the objectives of the new student admission policy in junior high schools in Sukabumi City. The research was conducted to analyze the implementation of the PPDB zoning system in Sukabumi City using qualitative methods with the analysis technique of the Miles and Huberman models to compare with the theory originating from Van Meter and Van Horn. The results showed that Sukabumi City had implemented a zoning system to the variables in the Van Meter and Van Horn theories. There are several goals had not been achieved, namely removing the favorite school label, reducing dropout rates, increasing the net enrollment rate index, bringing parents and children closer together, and evaluating the distribution of schools in Sukabumi City. The goal has not been achieved because of the lack of bureaucratic commitment and fragmentation in the form of pressure from outside the bureaucratic unit.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
J. Nguyen, C. Tiu, J. Stewart, and D. Miller, “Global Zoning and Exchangeability of Field Trial Residues Between Zones: Are There Systematic Differences in Pesticide Residues Across Geographies?,” Statistics and Public Policy, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 14–23, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1080/2330443X.2018.1555068.
A. Qahmash, N. Ahmad, and A. Algarni, “Investigating Students’ Pre-University Admission Requirements and Their Correlation with Academic Performance for Medical Students: An Educational Data Mining Approach,” Brain Sci, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 456, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.3390/brainsci13030456.
K. Tan et al., “Zoning regulation and development model for water and land resources in the Karst Mountainous Region of Southwest China,” Land use policy, vol. 109, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105683.
Y. E. Coruhlu, B. Uzun, and O. Yildiz, “Zoning plan-based legal confiscation without expropriation in Turkey in light of ECHR decisions,” Land use policy, vol. 95, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104598.
Z. Yu, Y. Jing, G. Yang, and R. Sun, “A new urban functional zone-based climate zoning system for urban temperature study,” Remote Sens (Basel), vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1–17, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.3390/rs13020251.
T. J. PlaHovinsak, “Exclusionary Zoning: Policy Design Lessons From the Mount Laurel Decisions,” Hous Policy Debate, pp. 806–822, 2020, doi: 10.1080/10511482.2020.1761856.
K. Brzozowska, “Zoning Policy in Terms of the Sustainability of Municipalities in Poland,” 2021.
W. Ha, “Comment on ‘What Can Students Gain from China’s Higher Education?,’” Asian Economic Policy Review. John Wiley and Sons Inc, 2023. doi: 10.1111/aepr.12433.
H. Wong and S. Leung, “How do Tertiary Education Students Perceive Co-Curricular Activities under the New Education System?,” International Education Studies, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 83, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.5539/ies.v11n2p83.
R. Hughes, L. Dahlin, and T. Tucci, “An Investigation of a Multiple-Measures Teaching Evaluation System and Its Relationship With Students’ College-Going Outcomes,” Educational Policy, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 131–158, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1177/0895904818813302.
D. Deng, S. Seepho, and A. Lian, “Preferential admission policies for ethnic minority students in Yunnan: Help or hindrance,” International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 356–376, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.26803/ijlter.19.4.21.
H. Seckinelgin, “Teaching social policy as if students matter: Decolonizing the curriculum and perpetuating epistemic injustice,” Crit Soc Policy, May 2022, doi: 10.1177/02610183221103745.
E. Hamouda, “An optimal flow admission and routing control policy for resource constrained networks,” Sensors (Switzerland), vol. 20, no. 22, pp. 1–26, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.3390/s20226566.
S. S. Salunkhe, A. Deshpande, and Y. Joshi, “Degree of Certainty in Students’ Academic Performance Evaluation Using a New Fuzzy Inference System,” Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 537–554, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1515/jisys-2016-0293.
Sarkadi, S. Syarifa, and A. R. Casmana, “The policy of education based on character values for the best quality of education ‘an analysis of the zoning system policy imposed by ministry of education and culture in Indonesia,’” Universal Journal of Educational Research, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 3423–3429, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.13189/ujer.2020.080816.
Y.-H. Sung and H.-M. Lin, “Taiwanese Students’ Considering Factors and Practical Suggestions Toward Studying Abroad in New Southbound Policy Countries,” Asian Soc Sci, vol. 14, no. 10, p. 75, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.5539/ass.v14n10p75.
S. Wijayanto, D. Napitupulu, K. Adiyarta, and A. P. Windarto, “Decision Support System of New Student Admission Using Analytical Hierarchy Process and Simple Additive Weighting Methods,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Institute of Physics Publishing, Sep. 2019. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1255/1/012054.
D. Blazar, “Validating teacher effects on students’ attitudes and behaviors: Evidence from random assignment of teachers to students,” Educ Finance Policy, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 281–309, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1162/edfp_a_00251.
Sugiyono, Quantitative, Qualitative and R and D Research Methods. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2019.