Developing Speaking Instruction Through Metacognitive Approach

https://doi.org/10.55299/ijere.v2i2.450

Authors

  • Mahdiah Apandi Muslim Nusantara Al Washliyah University, Medan, North Sumatera, Indonesia
  • Didik Santoso Muslim Nusantara Al Washliyah University, Medan, North Sumatera, Indonesia

Keywords:

Speaking, Instruction, Metacognitive Approach

Abstract

The teachers’ speaking instruction is considered successful if the student’s skills in English speaking increase. There are still many teachers who still use conventional instruction in teaching speaking. The traditional approaches to language teaching only focus on teacher-centered. This can be proved by the result of observation at MTs Al Washliyah Kolam Junior High School. Teachers should adopt approaches that can help students develop their speaking skills in a holistic way. The theoretical model of this research uses Research and Development (R & D) method by using Borg and Gall model by limiting and simplifying it to just four steps, namely, Research & Information collection, Planning, Design of Product, and Expert Judgment. The result of this research: (1) The existing speaking instruction used by the English teacher at MTs Al Washliyah Kolam Junior High School still uses the traditional method. (2) Speaking instruction is needed by the students based on the data that the highest students need the Teacher’s help (80%) to speak English, the second rank students need to conclude the lesson (73,33%) when end the learning and give an example of speaking (40%) when speaking English. (3)The model is developed by the researcher to improve students' speaking skills is considered very relevant because the model created by experts was further developed for learning English speaking. (4) The result of expert judgment, the speaking instruction model through Metacognitive approach is valid and worth testing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

American Psychological Association. 2001. Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Apriani. 2012. Pendekatan Metakognitif Sebagai Alternatif Pembelajaran Matematika Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar. Bandung: UPI.

Borg, W.R. & Gall, M.D. 1983. Educational research: An introduction. New York: Longman.

Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F.E. Weinert & R.H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Brown, H. Douglas. 2003. Language Assessment Principle and Classroom Practice. New York: Pearson Longman.

Chamot, A. U., & O'malley, J. M. 1987. The cognitive academic language learning approach: A bridge to the mainstream. TESOL quarterly, 21(2), 227-249.

Cohen, A. D., Weaver, S. J., & Li, T. Y. (1996). The impact of strategies-based instruction on speaking a foreign language. Center for Advanced Research in Language Acquisition.

Flavell, J.H. 1976 ‘Metacognitive Aspects of Problem Solving’, in L.B. Resnick (ed.), The Nature of Intelligence (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum): 231-35.

Flavell, J. H. 1979. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive –developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911

Harmer, Jeremy. 2002. The Practice of English Language Teaching, 3rd Ed. Pearson Education limited England.

Hornby, 1990. Teaching English to Speakers of Other Language. London: Cambridge University Press.P:1227

Howarth, P. 2001. Process speaking: Preparing to repeat yourself. MET, 10(1), 39-44

Magdalena, I., Cahyani, A. P., Ananda, P. S., & Nur’alfiah, S. 2020. Pengaplikasian Strategi Instruksional pada Siswa SD Kelas VI di MI Al-Hikmah 1 Sepatan. PANDAWA, 2(3), 419-438.

Maulana. 2008. Dasar-dasar keilmuan matematika. Bandung: Royyan Press

Mayer, R. E., & Estrella, G. 2014. Benefits of emotional design in multimedia instruction. Learning and Instruction, 33, 12-18.

Merrill, M. D. 2002. First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.

Mulbar, U.2008. Metakognisi Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika. Makalah Pendidikan. FMIPA UNM Makasar.

Nietfeld, John L., and Gregory Schraw. 2002.The effect of knowledge and strategy training on monitoring accuracy. The Journal of Educational Research 95.3: 131-142

O'malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. 1990. Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press

Oxford, R. L. 1990. Language learning strategies. Heinle & Heinle Publishers. Massachusets.

Porter, J.2021. An Investigation of the Use of Neuroeducation Instructional Strategies in Neurodiverse and Neurotypical Private Middle Schools. Doctoral dissertation, California Coast University.

Richards, Platt, and Platt. 1993. Dictionary of Language Teaching & Applied Linguistics. London: Longman

Santee, William R.2003. Load carriage model development and testing with field data. ARMY RESEARCH INST OF ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE NATICK Mas

Semiawan, T.2010. Analisis Pesan Kepemimpinan Pada Film “ The Conductors” Karya Andy Bachtiar Yususf 2007. .Doctoral dissertation, University of Muhammadiyah Malang.

Shakoor, Tariq; Hussain, Tariq; Ali, Saleha.2012. Analysis of Grade Three Students Performance in the Subject of English in Pakistan. American International Journal of Contemporary Research Vol. 2 No. 11

Sugiyono. 2011. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. 2014. Metode Kuantitatif Kulitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta: Jakarta

Thornbury, Scott. 2005. How to Teach Speaking. Harlow. Pearson Education

Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M., & Therriault, D.2003. Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects the learning of texts. Journal of educational psychology, 95(1), 66.

Torky, SAEL. 2006. The Effectiveness of a Task-Based Instruction Program in Developing the English Language Speaking Skills of Secondary Stage Students. Online Submission, Ph.D. Dissertation, Ain Shams University

Tulusita, L.D.R. 2016. Metacognitive Strategy Training to Promote Students’ Speaking Skills.Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Bandar Lampung: Language and Arts Education Department, Teacher Training and Education Faculty, Lampung University.

Ur, P. 1996. A course in language teaching, practice and theory. Cambridge University Press.

Wellman, H. 1985. The Origins of Metacognition. In D.L. Forrest-Pressley, G.E.

Williams, Marion, and Robert Burden.1999. Students' developing conceptions of themselves as language learners. The Modern Language Journal 83.2: 193-201.

Konder Manurung, 2015. Improving the Speaking Skill Using Reading Contextual Internet-Based Instructional Materials in an EFL Class in Indonesia.

Zoro, 2020 Teaching in General https://teachingingeneral.blogspot.com/2020/10/teaching-approach-metacognitive.html

Published

2023-09-25

How to Cite

Apandi, M., & Didik Santoso. (2023). Developing Speaking Instruction Through Metacognitive Approach. International Journal of Educational Research Excellence (IJERE), 2(2), 315–320. https://doi.org/10.55299/ijere.v2i2.450