A New Approach to Curriculum Development: The Relevance of the Higher Education Curriculum to Industry Needs
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The relevance of higher education curricula to the evolving needs of industry is key to providing students with the skills and knowledge they need. A new approach to curriculum development is needed, which includes several important aspects. First, the relevance of the curriculum must be placed in a broader social context, taking into account the social impact and contribution of students to society. Project-based learning is also emerging as an effective model, involving students in research or problem-solving projects that provide real-world experience. The importance of formative assessment as a tool for providing feedback that helps students improve their understanding is also highlighted. Involving students as active partners in curriculum development can create greater engagement. The curriculum must be able to accommodate student diversity and promote inclusivity. A competency-based approach emphasizes the development of practical skills that are relevant to the real world. A curriculum that is responsive to industry changes provides graduates with skills that increase their competitiveness in the job market. Close collaboration with industry is a key factor in ensuring curriculum relevance. Continuous evaluation, industrial training for lecturers, and flexibility in the curriculum are important strategies. The relevance of the curriculum is the key to creating graduates who are ready to face the ever-growing world of work and contribute to industrial innovation. This approach recognizes the importance of renewal and relevance in higher education to produce graduates who are ready to face changes in the ever-evolving world of work. This is a challenge and opportunity to create future leaders who innovate, are open-minded, and able to adapt to rapid changes in the dynamic world of work. In the era of globalization and technological development, the relevance of higher education curricula is becoming increasingly important to ensure graduates have relevant skills.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Anderson, L.S., & Harris, K.R. (2019). "Curriculum Development for Medical Education: A Six-Step Approach." Johns Hopkins University Press.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives.
Association of American Colleges and Universities. (nd). "Fulfilling the American Dream: Liberal Education and the Future of Work."
Boote, D. N., & Beile, P. (2005). "Scholars Before Researchers: On the Centrality of the Dissertation Literature Review in Research Preparation." Educational Researcher, 34(6), 3-15.
Carnevale, A. P., Smith, N., & Melton, M. (2011). "STEM: Science Technology Engineering Mathematics." Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce.
Cooper, H. M. (1982). "Scientific Guidelines for Conducting Integrative Research Reviews." Review of Educational Research, 52(2), 291-302.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. John Wiley & Sons.
Davis, R.B. (2018). "Approaches to Curriculum Planning." The Center on Innovations in Learning.
Fink, A. (2014). "Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper." Sage Publications.
Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Learning Activity Types: Curriculum-Based Technology Integration Reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393–416.
Jesson, J., Matheson, L., & Lacey, F. M. (2011). "Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques." Sage Publications.
Mulder, M., Gulikers, J., Biemans, H., & Wesselink, R. (2009). The New Competence Concept in Higher Education: Error or Enrichment? Journal of European Industrial Training, 33(8/9), 755–770.
Parliament of Australia. (2018). "Industry-research collaboration." Retrieved from https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/rp1819/IndustryCollaboration#_Toc5243
Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. (2018). "UK Quality Code for Higher Education: Chapter B3: Learning and Teaching." Retrieved from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/en/Publications/Documents/Chapter-B3-Learning-and-teaching.pdf
Ridley, D. (2012). "The Literature Review: A Step-by-Step Guide for Students." Sage Publications.
Ross, P. E., & Marker, A. (2017). "Curriculum Development and Evaluation in Nursing." Springer Publishing Company.
Smith, J., & Johnson, A. (2022). "New Approaches to Curriculum Development: The Relevance of Higher Education Curriculum to Industry Needs." Journal of Higher Education Curriculum, 25(2), 45-62.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
World Economic Forum. (2018). "The Future of Jobs Report 2018." Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs_2018.pdf
Yorio, P.L., & Ye, F. (2012). "A meta‐analysis on the effects of laboratory instruction on student achievement." Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(5), 487-493.