The Use of the Everyone is Teacher here Learning Strategy in Affecting Class X SMA Students' Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability

https://doi.org/10.55299/ijere.v2i2.451

Authors

  • Buang Saryantono STKIP PGRI Bandar Lampung, Indonesia
  • Joko Sutrisno AB STKIP PGRI Bandar Lampung, Indonesia
  • Hesti Noviyana STKIP PGRI Bandar Lampung, Indonesia

Keywords:

Critical Thinking, Strategy Every One, Teacher

Abstract

The ability to think critically mathematically is one of the important abilities required in learning mathematics at the senior high school level in the independent curriculum. This ability is also one of the abilities demanded by the 21st century educational revolution. The importance of this ability is not in line with the mathematical critical thinking abilities of high school students, as was the problem of research in class X MIA at SMA Negeri 1 Natar Lampung Selatan. Given the importance of critical thinking skills, the purpose of this study was to determine the effect of using Everyone is a Teacher Here strategy on students' mathematical critical thinking abilities. This research is a quasi-experimental study with a population of all students of class X MIA even semester of SMA Negeri 1 Natar Lampung Selatan consisting of 8 classes with a total of 228 students, while 2 classes were taken, namely class X MIA 8 as the experimental class totaling 36, and class X MIA 7 as the control class, totaling 36. The sample was taken using a random sampling technique. Students' mathematical critical thinking ability is measured by a test in the form of a description of 5 questions which have previously been tested for validity and reliability. Testing the hypothesis in this study using the t test. From the results of hypothesis testing, it can be concluded that the use of the Everyone is a Teacher Here strategy can influence the mathematical critical thinking skills of class X MIA students at SMA Negeri 1 Natar Lampung.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Djamarah, S, B. (2014). Guru dan Anak Didik dalam Interaksi Edukatif. Jakarta: PT. Asdi Mahasatya.

Hendriana, dkk. (2016). Hard Skills dan Soft Skills Matematik Siswa. Bandung: STKIP Siliwangi Press.

Heru, P. (2019). Pengaruh Strategi Everyone is a Teacher Here terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas V MI. Jurnal Naturalistic: Jurnal Kajian Penelitian dan Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 4 (1), 443-451.

Lestari, K. E. dan Yudhanegara, M. R. (2015). Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Maisura. dan Ridwan. (2012). Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Tentang Sifat-Sifat Bangun Datar Melalui Strategi Pembelajaran Everyone Is A Teacher Here Pada Siswa Kelas V Min Bayu Gampong. Jupendas, 2 (1) [Online]. Tersedia di http:/ /jfkip.umuslim. ac.id/index .php/ jupendas/article/ view/ 228.

Noer, H, S. (2009). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa Smp Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Unversitas Negri Yogyakarta [Online]. tersedia di http://eprints.uny.ac.id/7048/.

Rohmawati , I. dan Rohaeti, E.(2015). Pengaruh Penerapan Strategi Everyone Is A Teacher Here Terhadap Kemandirian dan Prestasi Belajar Kimia. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika [Online]. Tersedia di http://journal.student.uny.ac.id /ojs/index.php/pkimia/article/view/3787.

Suprijono, A. (2009). Cooperative Learning. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Suriani, A, D., dan Nenowati, S. (2020). Penerapan Strategi Pembelajaran Everyone is a Teacher Here Dampaknya Terhadap Hasil Belajar Murid Kelas V SD Negeri Sungguminasa Iii Kabupaten Gowa. Jurnal kajian Pendidikan Dasar, 5 (1), 51-60.

Zaini, H. Munthe, B., dan Aryani, A, S. (2002). Strategi Pembelajaran Aktif di Perguruan Tinggi. Yogyakarta: CTDS (Center For Teaching Staff Development).

Published

2023-08-07

How to Cite

Buang Saryantono, Joko Sutrisno AB, & Hesti Noviyana. (2023). The Use of the Everyone is Teacher here Learning Strategy in Affecting Class X SMA Students’ Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability. International Journal of Educational Research Excellence (IJERE), 2(2), 252–256. https://doi.org/10.55299/ijere.v2i2.451