Analysis of Mathematical Literacy Behaviour of Junior High School Students
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Literacy is not only an ability to read and write but also to interpret responses and understand, as well as an ability to do daily activities. Research previously studied ability literacy in aspects cognitive, whereas aspects are affective and psychomotor. The same importance is placed on an aspect of cognitive—the study of cognitive, affective and psychomotor behaviour. Therefore, this research aims to find out and measure the extent of mathematical literacy among students at one of the Cirebon Regency junior high schools. School This is taken with the purposive random sampling method. Study This uses instrument rubric behaviour literacy mathematics and tests literacy valid and reliable mathematics. The result shows literacy mathematical students dominated by level moderate (51.51%). Behaviour literacy mathematical students are differentiated into three categories, namely superior, regular, and inferior; presentation behaviour literacy mathematical student is 30% for inferior, 50% for regular, and 20% for superior. The writer recommends that the teacher give questions to students with a hook with Life a Day so that students can understand the questions given.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Ada, K., Tapan Broutin, M. S., Kaleli Yılmaz, G., & Bayram, G. M. (2021). Investigation of documentation processes of students with low and high level of mathematical literacy: A case study. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(4), 189–213. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2021474615
Andari, R. M., & Ekawati, R. (2021). Levels of Student Mathematical Literacy Using Indonesian Culture Context. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika, 5(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpipm.v5n1.p1-19
Chairunnisa. (2017). Pengaruh Literasi Membaca Dengan Pemahaman Bacaan (Penelitian Survei pada Mahasiswa STKIP Kusumanegara Jakarta). TUTURAN JURNAL PENDIDIKAN, BAHASA DAN SASTRA, Vol. 6(1), 745–756. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/jt.v6i1.1584
Faizah, S. N. (2020). Hakikat Belajar Dan Pembelajaran. At-Thullab : Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 1(2), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.30736/atl.v1i2.85
Gunawan, I., Darhim, D., & Kusnandi, K. (2019). Exploration of the behavior of understanding mathematical concepts of junior high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042098
Harisman, Y., Dwina, F., Syaputra, H., & Hasril Amiruddin, M. (2023a). Mathematical Literacy Behavior of Junior High School Students in Indonesia. Social Sciences and Humanities Open . https://ssrn.com/abstract=4672086
Harisman, Y., Dwina, F., Syaputra, H., & Hasril Amiruddin, M. (2023b). Mathematical Literacy Behavior of Junior High School Students in Indonesia. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4672086
Hemalya, F., Yuniati, S., Rahmi, D., & Kurniati, A. (2023). Meta-Analisis: Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis terhadap Modul Ajar Matematika. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v8i1.2902
Kabael, T., & Barak, B. (2016). Research of Middle School Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Mathematical Literacy on PISA Items. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 7(2), 321–349. https://doi.org/10.16949/turcomat.73360
Khaerunisak, K., Kartono, K., Hidayah, I., & Fahmi, A. Y. (2017). The Analysis of Diagnostic Assesment Result In PISA Mathematical Literacy Based On Student Self-Efficacy in RME Learning. Infinity Journal, 6(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v6i1.236
Komang Ari Damayanti, N., Made Suarsana, I., & Putu Pasek Suryawan, I. (2017). Peningkatan Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa Melalui Penerapan Collaborative Learning Model. Wahana Matematika Dan Sains: Jurnal Matematika, Sains, Dan Pembelajarannya, 11(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/wms.v11i1.11845
Krowka, S., Hadd, A., & Marx, R. (2017). “No Excuses” charter schools for increasing math and literacy achievement in primary and secondary education: a systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 13(1), 1–67. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2017.9
Kurniasari, N. D., Shobikhah, A., Triono, G., Rohman, T. B., Amelia, N. N., Ajwa, T., Teknologi, I., & Mandiri, I. C. (2023). Pengaruh Teknologi Informasi Sebagai Peningkatan Literasi Matematika Dalam Dunia Pendidikan Pada Siswa Menengah Pertama. Jurnal Spirit, 15(2), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.53567/spirit.v15i2.316
Kusnadi, F. N., Karlina Rachmawati, T., & Sugilar, H. (2021). Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematis Siswa Pada Materi Trigonometri. SJME (Supremum Journal of Mathematics Education), 5(2), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.35706/sjme.v5i2.5140
Lestari, F. D., Ibrahim, M., Ghufron, S., & Mariati, P. (2021). Pengaruh Budaya Literasi terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(6), 5087–5099. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i6.1436
Maria, E., Marbun, R., Mirza, A., Program, B., Pendidikan, S., Fkip, M., & Pontianak, U. (2019). Analisis Perilaku Pemecahan Masalah Berdasarkan Tingkat Self-Efficacy Matematika Siswa SMP Negeri 12 Pontianak. JPPK (Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran), 8(12), 1–8. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v8i12.38318
Masfufah, R., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Siswa melalui Soal PISA. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v10i2.825
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264190511-en
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en
Palinkas, L. A., Mendon, S. J., & Hamilton, A. B. (2019). Innovations in Mixed Methods Evaluations. Annual Review Of Public Health, 40, 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth
Purwanti, R. D., Pratiwi, D. D., & Rinaldi, A. (2016). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Berbatuan Geogebra terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Matematis ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif. Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v7i1.131
Rahmah, L., Johar, R., & Saminan, S. (2022). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Grafik Fungsi Trigonometri melalui ELPSA Framework Berbantuan GeoGebra untuk Meningkatkan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa. EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.20527/edumat.v10i1.10963
Rahmi, F., Iltavia, I., & Zarista, R. H. (2022). Mathematical Literacy of Junior High School Students in Solving Problems PISA in Minang Context. JTAM (Jurnal Teori Dan Aplikasi Matematika), 6(4), 1112–1127. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v6i4.10221
Rohati, R., Kusumah, Y. S., & Kusnandi, K. (2022). The development of analytical rubrics: An avenue to assess students’ mathematical reasoning behavior. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(8), 2553–2566. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i8.7043
Rohati, R., Kusumah, Y. S., & Kusnandi, K. (2023). Exploring Students’ Mathematical Reasoning Behavior in Junior High Schools: A Grounded Theory. Education Sciences, 13(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030252
Siregar, M. L., Novitasari, W., & Agustina, L. (2019). Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Siswa Melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Centered Learning (PCL) di SMA Negeri 1 Angkola Barat. EKSAKTA : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran MIPA, 4(1), 73–82. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31604/eksakta.v4i1.73-76
Stacey, K. (2011). The PISA View of Mathematical Literacy in Indonesia. Journal on Mathematics Education , 2(2), 95–126. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.22342/jme.2.2.746.95-126
Sufirman, S., Dafik, D., & Fatahillah, A. (2022). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran RBL-STEM Untuk Meningkatkan Metaliterasi Siswa Menerapkan Konsep Relasi Fungsi Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Dekorasi Teselasi Wallpaper. CGANT JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS AND APPLICATIONS, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.25037/cgantjma.v3i1.69
Sumirattana, S., Makanong, A., & Thipkong, S. (2017). Using realistic mathematics education and the DAPIC problem-solving process to enhance secondary school students’ mathematical literacy. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3), 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.06.001
Suningsih, A., & Istiani, A. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v10i2.984
Taskin, N., & Tugrul, B. (2014). Investigating Preschool Teacher Candidates’ Mathematics Literacy Self-sufficiency Beliefs on Various Variables. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3067–3071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.708
Utami, R. M., Raja, U. M., & Haji, A. (2022). Analisis Konsentrasi Belajar Matematika dalam Ranah Afektif Siswa Kelas IX SMP Negeri 1 Bintan Timur. MATH-EDU: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Matematika, 7(3), 156–166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32938/jipm.7.3.2022.156-166
Wardhani, S. and R. R. (2011). (2011). Instrumen Penilaian Hasil Belajar Matematika SMP: Belajar dari PISA dan TIMSS. In Modul .
Waruwu, M. (2023). Pendekatan Penelitian Pendidikan: Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Method). Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(1), 2869–2910. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v7i1.618